Skip to main content

International Journal of Phytomedicine and Phytotherapy

Table 1 Results of the anti-inflammatory activity of the total ethanolic extract and different fractions of A. hirtum leave using carrageenan – induced paw edema method

From: Anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipyretic and antidiabetic activities of Abutilon hirtum (Lam.) Sweet

Group

Thickness of the paw (mm)

0 h

30 min

1 h

2 h

3 h

4 h

5 h

Control (−ve)

7.37 ± 0. 12

7.37 ± 0.12

7.5 ± 0.0

7.62 ± 0.12

7.62 ± 0.12

7.87 ± 0.23

7.87 ± 0.23

Total extract (300 mg/kg)

7.25 ± 0.14

6.87 ± 0. 12

6.25 ± 0.14***

5.62 ± 0.23***

4.62 ± 0.23***

4.0 ± 0.20***

3.87 ± 0.12***

Petroleum ether fraction (300 mg/kg)

7.25 ± 0.14

7.12 ± 0.12

6.75 ± 0.14*

6.37 ± 0.23**

5.75 ± 0.32***

5.25 ± 0.25***

4.87 ± 0.12***

Chloroform fraction (300 mg/kg)

7.25 ± 0.14

6.62 ± 0.23*

6.37 ± 0.23***

5.62 ± 0.23***

4.87 ± 0.31***

4.0 ± 0.2***

3.87 ± 0.12***

Ethyl acetate fraction (300 mg/kg)

7.25 ± 0.14

7.0 ± 0.0

6.75 ± 0.14*

6.5 ± 0.2**

5.87 ± 0.12***

5.37 ± 0.37***

5.37 ± 0.37***

Aqueous fraction (300 mg/kg)

7.12 ± 0. 12

7.12 ± 0.12

6.75 ± 0.14*

6.5 ± 0.2**

6.0 ± 0.20***

4.87 ± 0.12***

4.75 ± 0.14***

Indomethacin (8 mg/kg)

7.25 ± 0.14

6.5 ± 0.2**

6.0 ± 0.20***

5.62 ± 0.23***

5.37 ± 0.23***

4.12 ± 0.12***

3.75 ± 0.14***

  1. The results are presented as the mean ± S.E.M Standard error of the mean. Differences with respect to the control group were calculated using the student’s T-test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001)