Skip to main content

International Journal of Phytomedicine and Phytotherapy

Table 4 Antioxidant activity of different parts of their extracts of S. indicus

From: Comparative assessment of antimicrobial and antioxidant activity between whole plant and parts of Sphaeranthus indicus Linn. (Asteraceae)

Parts

Extracts

Reducing power

(μg AAE/ ml of extract)

DMPD (IC50 in μg AAE/ ml of extract)

DPPH (IC50 in μg AAE/ ml of extract)

Whole plant

Hexane

17.97 ± 0.18i

 

Ethyl acetate

21.57 ± 0.06g,h

 

Methanol-polar fraction

52.87 ± 2.51e

23.62 ± 0.58b,c

35.40 ± 0.02b,c

 

Aqueous

49 ± 0.11e

19.24 ± 0.26e,f

38.12 ± 2.13a

Leaf

Hexane

22.37 ± 0.37g

 

Ethyl acetate

26.66 ± 0.04f

 

Methanol-polar fraction

60.33 ± 0.07d

28.29 ± 0.05a

37.69 ± 0.27a,b

 

Aqueous

328.93 ± 0.24a

25.53 ± 0.24b

35.82 ± 0.05a,b,c

Inflorescence

Hexane

18.20 ± 0.07i

 

Ethyl acetate

31.26 ± 0.08e

 

Methanol-polar fraction

43.4 ± 0.23f

28.65 ± 0.19a

34.61 ± 0.08c,d

 

Aqueous

109.53 ± 0.18c

29.69 ± 0.19a

35.91 ± 0.31a,b,c

Stem

Hexane

19.68 ± 0.03h,i

 

Ethyl acetate

35.33 ± 0.08b,c

 

Methanol-polar fraction

36.73 ± 0.07g

22.49 ± 0.20c,d

31.29 ± 0.07e

 

Aqueous

60.6 ± 1.62d

20.82 ± 0.43d,e

32.40 ± 0.06d,e

Root

Hexane

9.47 ± 0.08j

 

Ethyl acetate

17.44 ± 0.24i

 

Methanol-polar fraction

36.27 ± 0.07g

24.09 ± 0.76b,c

26.54 ± 0.08f

 

Aqueous

134.47 ± 0.18b

17.87 ± 0.40f

26.79 ± 0.06f

  1. The results are mean ± SE (n = 3). The different superscript letters denote the significant at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s test)