RETRACTED ARTICLE: Phytochemical Screening,
      Antioxidant and Antimicrobial activities of Senna
        occidentalis (L.) leaves Extract

Oluwakayode Odeja; Grace Obi; Christiana Ene Ogwuche; Elias Emeka Elemike; Yemi Oderinlo

doi:10.1186/s40816-015-0007-y

Original contribution

Open Access

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial activities of Senna occidentalis (L.) leaves Extract

Oluwakayode Odeja¹,
Grace Obi¹,
Christiana Ene Ogwuche¹,
Elias Emeka Elemike¹Email author and
Yemi Oderinlo²

Clinical PhytoscienceInternational Journal of Phytomedicine and Phytotherapy20151:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40816-015-0007-y

Received: 26 February 2015

Accepted: 30 June 2015

Published: 8 September 2015

The Retraction Note to this article has been published in Clinical Phytoscience 2016 2:13

Abstract

Background

Phytochemical screening, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the hexane, ethylacetate and methanol crude extracts of Senna occidentalis (L.) leaves were studied in this work. The aim of the work is to ascertain the level of antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of different solvent extracts of Senna occidentalis plant.

Methods

The preliminary screening of the various extracts was carried out using standard methods and the results revealed the presence of tannins, alkaloids, reducing sugar, phenols, anthraquinones, resins, saponins and glycosides. The antimicrobial screening was carried out using the following organisms; Staphylococcus aureus, Eshericha coli, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruguinosa, Salmonella typhi, Klebsiellae pneumoniae, Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium notatum and Rhizopus stolonifer. The free radical scavenging capacity using hydrogen peroxide was equally determined to evaluate the antioxidant activities of the extracts.

Results

The results obtained showed that Senna occidentalis (L.) leaf extracts have interesting pharmacological active compounds with great radical scavenging and antimicrobial effects and as such could be used in ethno medicine for treatment of some infections and ailments.

Conclusion

Further investigations on the chemical compositions and possible isolation of active ingredients would be carried out.

Keywords

AntioxidantAntimicrobial Senna occidentalis (L.)PhytochemicalsOrganismsEthnomedicine

Background

Plants are important source of drugs; especially in traditional medicine [1]. It is a common practice in Nigeria and other parts of the world to use plant in the form of crude extracts, decoction, infusion or tincture to treat common infection and chronic conditions. According to WHO, over 70 % of the world populations rely on medicinal plants for primary health care² and there are reports from various researchers on natural substances of plant origin which are biologically active, with desirable antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [2–4].

Despite tremendous progress in human medicines, infectious diseases caused by bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites are still a major threat to public health. There impact is particularly large in developing countries due to relative unavailability of medicines and the emergence of widespread drug resistance [5].

The active principle of many drugs found in plants is phytochemicals [6]. The medicinal value of these phytochemicals is because of the presence of chemical substance that produces definite physiological action on the human body [7]. Some of the valuable ones include; alkaloids, tannins, saponins, glycosides, flavonoids, phosphorus and calcium for cell growth, replacement, and body building [7]. During the last two decades, the development of drug resistance as well as the appearance of undesirable side effects of certain antibiotics has lead to the search for new antimicrobial agents mainly among plant extracts with the goal to discover new chemical structures, which overcome the above disadvantages [8, 9]. Current research on natural molecule and products primarily focuses on plants since they can be sourced more easily and be selected based on their ethno-medicinal uses [10]. Interest has also increased recently in finding natural occurring antioxidants for use in foods or medicinal materials to replace synthetic antioxidants which are being restricted due to their carcinogenicity [11]. Antioxidants have become synonymous with good health; they are a class of compounds thought to prevent certain types of chemical damage caused by an excess of free radicals, charged molecules that are generated by a variety of sources including, smoking, pesticide and fumes from exhaust. Destroying free radicals may help fight cancer, heart diseases, stroke and other immune compromising diseases [12, 13].

Senna occidentalis (L.) a small shrub about 3 ft. high belong to Leguminosae family. It is native to the tropical regions of America and naturalized in Australia, eastern Africa, southern and eastern USA [14]. Plants belonging to the family have been extensively investigated because of their rich medicinal (anti-inflammatory, anti-carcinogenic, anti-mutagenic, anti-plasmodial, anti-rheumatic and hepatoprotective) and economic uses [15–19]. Despite its great importance, Senna occidentalis plant is one of the most toxic plants of veterinary interest as regards contamination of animal rations. Its poisoning effects include ataxia, diarrhea, myoglobinuria and sternal recumbency leading to death depending on the animal. Studies have shown that histopathological tests of animals fed with the plant revealed that the heart and liver were the main organs affected with myocardial necrosis and centrolobular development [20].

It is part of our continuing effort and mandate to investigate Nigeria medicinal floras, since studies on this plant showed that the nature and amount of the phytochemicals varies according to the season, geographical location and because much work has not been done on this particular genus [21]. This paper reports on the phytoconstituents, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Senna occidentalis.

Methods

Plant material

Fresh leaves of Senna occidentalis (L.) were collected from botanical garden of University of Ibadan, Ibadan. Specimens were identified by Mr. Donatus Eratus and authenticated by Dr. Ayodele of the Department of Botany, University of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. The leaves were chopped into pieces using knife and then air dried under shade for 10 days and grounded into mesh size and kept in a non-absorptive nylon for subsequent use.

Preparation of extracts

Dried and milled leaf materials were extracted successively with Soxhlet extractor at temperature of 80 °C. Each of the solvent; hexane, ethylacetate and methanol were allowed to remain in contact with the plant material for 12 h; the extracts were evaporated to dryness using rotary evaporator.

Phytochemical analysis

The extracts were analyzed for the presence of alkaloids, resins, tannins, saponins, flavonoids, glycosides, phenols, anthraquinones, cardiac glycosides, steroids, phlobatannins, reducing sugars [22–25].

Test for alkaloids

0.2 g of extracts was shaken with 1 % HCl for two minutes. The mixture was filtered and drops of Dragendorff’s reagent added. Formation of a precipitate indicated the presence of alkaloids.

Test for saponins

0.2 g of extracts was shaken with 5 ml of distilled water in a test tube. Frothing which persists on warming was taken as evidence for the presence of saponins.

Test for tannins

0.2 g of extracts was stirred with distilled water and filtered. Ferric chloride was added to the filtrate. A blue-black, green or blue-green precipitate was taken as an evidence for the presence of tannins.

Test for steroids (Salkowski’s test)

0.2 g of the extracts was dissolved in 2 ml of chloroform. Concentrated sulphuric acid was carefully added to form a lower layer. A reddish-brown colour at the interphase indicated the deoxy sugar characteristics of cardenolides.

Test for cardiac-active glycoside (keller-killani test)

0.2 g of the extracts was dissolved in 2 ml of glacial acetic acid containing one drop of ferric chloride solution followed by the addition of 1 ml of concentrated sulphuric acid. A brown ring at the interface confirmed the presence of cardiac glycoside.

Test for reducing sugars

0.2 g of the extracts was shaken with distilled water and filtered. The filtrate was boiled with drops of Fehling’s solution A and B for two minutes. An orange precipitate on boiling with the Fehling’s solution indicated the presence of reducing sugars.

Test for flavonoids

A little amount of magnesium powder and few drops of concentrated hydrochloric acid were added to 3 ml of the extracts. A red or intense red colouration indicated the presence of flavonones.

Test for resins

5 ml of copper acetate solution was added to 5 ml of the extracts. The resulting solution was shaken vigorously and allowed to separate. A green coloured solution is an evidence of the presence of resin.

Test for anthraquinones

0.2 g of the extracts was shaken with 4 ml of benzene. The mixture was filtered and 2 ml of 10 % ammonia solution was added to the filtrate. The mixture was shaken and the presence of pink, red or violet colour in the ammoniacal (Lower) phase indicated the presence of free anthraquinones.

Test for phenols

0.2 g of extracts was dissolved in Ferric chloride solution. A green or dirty green precipitate indicated the presence of phenolic compound.

Test for phlobatannins

The extracts (0.5 g) was dissolved in distilled water and filtered. The filtrate was boiled with 2 % HCl solution. Red precipitate shows the presence of Phlobatannins.

Test for glycosides

The extracts was hydrolyzed with HCl solution and neutralized with NaOH solution. A few drops of Fehlings solution A and B were added. Red precipitate indicates the presence of glycosides.

Scavenging of hydrogen peroxide

The ability of the extracts to scavenge hydrogen peroxide was determined according to the method by Nabavi et al., 2008a and 2008b [26, 27]. A solution of hydrogen peroxide (2 mM) was prepared in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The concentration of hydrogen peroxide was determined by absorption at 285 nm using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer. The samples at ‘1 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, 0.25 mg/ml, 0.125 mg/ml and 0.0625 mg/ml’ were added to H₂O_2. The decrease in absorbance of H₂O₂ at 285 nm was measured spectrophotometrically after ten minutes (10 min) against a blank solution containing the test sample in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) without H₂O₂ and blank solution containing phosphate buffer without hydrogen peroxide (control). All the tests were performed in triplicate. The percentage of hydrogen peroxide scavenged by the extracts was calculated as follows:

$$ \%\kern0.5em Scavenged\kern0.5em \left[{H}_2{O}_2\right]=\left({A}_c-{A}_s\right)/{A}_c\Big]\times 100 $$

(1)

Where A_c is the absorbance of the control and A_s the absorbance in the presence of the sample of extract and standard [25, 26]. The values of % inhibition were obtained from Eq. 1. For the 50 % Inhibitory Concentration (IC₅₀) evaluation of the extract, graphs showing the concentration of the test samples (hexane extract, ethyl acetate extract, methanol extract and the alpha tocopherol) versus % Inhibition (% H₂O₂ reduction) were plotted.

Preparation of graded concentration of the samples

1000 mg of each sample was weighed and dissolved into 5 ml of the solvent of extraction in order to obtain proper dissolution. From the 200 mg/ml solution, 2.5 ml was taken into another sample bottle and 2.5 ml of solvent was added to give 100 mg/ml. From this, 2.5 ml is taken into another sample bottle and 2.5 ml of solvent was added to give 50 mg/ml solution. From the 50 mg/ml solution, 2.5 ml was taken into another sample bottle and 2.5 ml of solvent added to give 25 mg/ml solution. Similar procedure was followed to obtain the 12.5 mg/ml and 6.25 mg/ml concentrations, using dry filter paper dispersion method.

Organisms

Bacteria- S.a : Staphylococcus aureus, E.c : Eshericha coli, B.sab : Bacillus subtilis, Ps. a : Pseudomonas aeruguinosa, Sal. t : Salmonella typhi, Klebs : Klebsiellae pneumoniae.,

Fungi- C. a : Candida albicans, A. n : Aspergillus niger, Pen : Penicillum notatum, Rhi . : Rhizopus stolonifer.

-ve: Negative control; Methanol for methanolic extract, ethylacetate for ethylacetate extract and hexane for hexane extract.

+ve: Positive control; Gentamicin 10 μg/ml (bacterial) and Tiocosnazole 70 % (fungi).

Antimicrobial screening

The microbes used were suspended in suitable nutrition media and was poured into a sterile petri-dish and allowed to incubate for 24 h at 37 °C. Suitably cut circular filter paper pieces were immersed in the antibiotic solutions of both test samples and standards. Then the pieces were placed on the nutritional microbial media all over with suitable gaps in between and incubated again.

After 24 h of incubation, the plates were removed and the diameter of the zone of inhibition of test and standard samples were measured in millimeters.

By comparing the areas of zone of inhibition of test extracts with standard, the concentration and potency of test samples were determined.

Result and discussion

The preliminary phytochemical screening revealed the presence of alkaloids, saponins, tannins, reducing sugar, phenols, anthraquinones, glycosides and resins in some of the extracts (hexane, ethylacetate, methanol) as shown in the Table 1. The methanol extract shows the presence of saponins, tannins, alkaloids, phenols, anthraquinones and resins. The ethyl acetate extract shows alkaloids, anthraquinones and resins while the hexane extract shows the presence of alkaloids, reducing sugar and glycosides.

Table 1

Different constituents of the various extracts of Senna occidentalis leaves

Solvent	Saponin	flavonoid	Tanin	Phlobatannin	Steroid	Cardiac Glycoside	Akaloid	Reducing sugar	Phenol	Anthraquinone	Glycosides	Resin
HSO.	-	-	-	-	-	-	+	+	-	-	+	-
ESO	-	-	-	-	-	-	+	-	-	+	-	+
MSO	+	-	+	-	-	-	+	-	+	+	-	+

HSO : Hexane extract of Senna occidentalis

ESO : Ethylacetate extract of Senna occidentalis

MSO : Methanol extract of senna occidentalis

+ : Present

- : Not present

The ability of the extracts to scavenge hydrogen peroxide was determined according to the method by Nabavi et al.; 2008a and 2008b. In the hydrogen peroxide scavenging radical method, the percentage inhibition of the methanolic extract was in the range of 28.29 % – 86.03 %. The lowest concentration (0.0625 mg/ml) showed the highest percentage inhibition value (86.03 %) as shown in Fig. 1. There is a characteristic increase in inhibition as the concentration decreases. The ethylacetate extract also showed similar trend as revealed in Table 2 and Fig. 2 (28.31 % at 1.0 mg/ml, 52.95 %, 84.64 %, 88.45 % at 0.5 mg/ml, 0.25 mg/ml, 0.125 mg/ml respectively, and 93.38 % at 0.0625 mg/ml). The hexane extract followed similar trend, showing 87.77 % at 1 mg/ml and 91.73 %, 91.87 %, 96.95 % at 0.5 mg/ml, 0.25 mg/ml, 0.125 mg/ml respectively and 97.80 % at 0.0625 mg/ml as shown in Fig. 3. At the lowest concentration of 0.0625 mg/ml the percentage inhibition was the highest for all the extracts. The IC₅₀ (the concentration of the samples required to scavenge 50 % of the peroxide radicals) was actually used to examine the antioxidant effectiveness of the samples. The lower the IC₅₀, the greater the overall effectiveness of the suspected antioxidant sample in question. From the results obtained, it was revealed that the synthetic antioxidant (α-tocopherol), showed the best antioxidant effectiveness with IC₅₀ of 0.24. However, the test samples; MSO, ESO and HSO had IC₅₀ of 0.38, 0.66 and 4.73 respectively. Therefore, the α-tocopherol is more effective than the test samples, although they are good antioxidants. Figure 4 shows the inhibition efficiency of the α-tocopherol which is used as standard in this study. The trend thus: α-tocopherol > MSO > ESO > HSO (The order of decreasing antioxidant effectiveness).

Fig. 1
A plot of % inhibition against concentration for HSO showing the IC₅₀

Table 2

The percentage inhibition (antioxidant levels) of the different concentrations of the three different extracts

Conc. (mol/dm³)	HSO	ESO	MSO	α-Tocopherol
1.0	87.77	28.31	28.29	21.6987
0.5	91.73	52.95	28.30	23.7504
0.25	91.87	84.64	42.20	40.2791
0.125	96.95	88.45	62.06	52.7396
0.0625	97.80	93.38	86.03	75.1937

Fig. 2
A plot of % inhibition against concentration for ESO showing the IC₅₀

Fig. 3
A plot of % inhibition against concentration for MSO showing the IC₅₀

Fig. 4
A plot of % inhibition against concentration for α-tocopherol(control) showing the IC₅₀

The three different extracts were effective antibacterial and antifungal agents with methanol extract showing the greatest activity. The presence of phytochemicals has been attributed to be the bioactive principle responsible for the antimicrobial activities of most medicinal plants [28]. The methanol extract contains tannins, saponins, alkaloids, anthraquinones, and resins which majorly were absent in the hexane and ethyl acetate extracts. These secondary metabolites which have been reported to offer great pharmacological activites both in traditional and orthodox medicine are responsible for the enhanced activity of the methanol extract as shown in Table 3.

Table 3

The zones of inhibition of the isolates at different concentrations compared to the control drugs

			MOS
Conc.(mg/ml)	Sa	Ec	B.Sab	Ps.a	Sal	Klebs	C.a	A.n	Rhi	Pen
200	30	30	28	28	28	26	20	20	20	20
100	26	28	24	26	26	22	16	18	18	16
50	22	24	20	22	22	18	14	14	14	14
25	18	20	16	18	18	14	12	12	12	12
12.5	14	16	12	14	14	12	10	-	10	-
6.25	12	14	10	10	10	10	-	-	-	-
			HSO
200	18	14	14	16	14	18	16	16	16	14
100	14	12	12	12	12	16	12	14	14	12
50	12	10	10	10	10	14	10	12	12	10
25	10	-	-	-	-	10	-	10	10	-
12.5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
6.25	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
			ESO
200	26	24	26	24	26	24	20	18	16	14
100	24	20	22	20	22	20	18	14	12	12
50	18	16	18	16	18	16	12	12	10	10
25	16	14	12	14	14	12	10	10	-	-
12.5	12	10	10	10	10	10	-	-	-	-
6.25	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
-ve	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
+ve	38	38	40	38	38	38	28	28	26	28

-ve : shows that the solvents used could not inhibit the growth of the microbes

+ve : shows the level of inhibition of the standards used against the microbes

Among all the bacterial organisms screened, the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Eschericha coli were majorly inhibited in the methanol extract; Klebsillae pneumoniae and Staphylococuus aureus in hexane extract while Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhii in the ethylacetate extract.

Comparatively, multicellular metabolism of the Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger were the most hindered by the extracts placing them at a minimum inhibitory concentration of 25 mg/ml with few exceptions as shown in Table 3.

Conclusion

From the results obtained, this plant has the ability to scavenge for free radicals and contain bioactive compounds that can inhibit the growth of microorganisms. The methanol extract proved to be the most effective among the three extracts used and thus support the use of the plant in formulation of new antimicrobial and antioxidant drugs.

Further investigations on the chemical compositions and possible isolation of the active ingredient for specific functions in order to standardize the formulation for efficient medical use would be carried out.

Notes

The Editor-in-Chief of Clinical Phytoscience retracts the above-mentioned article per the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines on redundant publication.

The Editor- in-Chief and the publisher of Clinical Phytoscience have been made aware that this article was previously published in another journal. The article was examined following the COPE guidelines with regard to suspected redundant (duplicate) publication and was indeed found to be a duplication of the following previously published article: Odeja OO, Obi G, Ogwuche CE, Elemike EE, Oderinlo OO (2014). Phytochemical screening, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial activities of Senna occidentalis (L.) leaves. International Journal of Herbal Medicine 2014; 2 (4): 26-30)

The Editor-in-Chief of Clinical Phytoscience takes issues of research and publication misconduct seriously in order to preserve the integrity of the academic record.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the technologists of Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Petroleum Resources Effurun, and the management of central laboratory and Mr Charles Nwabueze of Chemistry Laboratory University of Ibadan for their assistance during the course of this research.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)

Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Petroleum Resources Effurun, Effurun, Nigeria

(2)

Department of Chemical Sciences, Federal University Otuoke, Otuoke, Nigeria

References

Bako SP, Bakfur MJ, John I, Bala EI. Ethnomedicinal and phytochemical profile of some savanna plant species in Nigeria. Int J Bot. 2005;1(2):147–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, 2008. Traditional Medicine. Media Centre Fact Sheet No 134. Accessed from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs134/en/.
Mahesh B, Satish S. Antimicrobial activity of some important medicinal plant against plant and human pathogens. World J Agri Sci. 2008;4(S):839–43.Google Scholar
Hamid AA, Aiyelaagbe OO, Usman LA, Ameen OM, Lawal A. Antioxidants: Its medicinal and pharmacological applications. African J of Pure and Applied Chemistry. 2010;4(1):007–10.Google Scholar
Zampini IC, Cuello S, Alberto MR, Ordonez RM, Almeida RD, Solorzano E, et al. Antimicrobial activity of selected plant species from the Argentine puna against sensitive and multiresistant bacteria. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;124:499–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
El-olemy, M.M, Al-Muhtadi, F.J and Afifi, A.A (1994). Experimental phytochemistry; A laboratory Manual king saud University press pp. 350–359.Google Scholar
Harbone JB. phytochemical methods. A guide to modern technique of plant Analysis. London: Chapinan and Hall; 1973. p. 33–185.Google Scholar
Okemo PO, Bais HP, Vivanco JM. In vitro activities of Maesa lanceolata extracts against fungal plant pathogens. Fitoterapia. 2003;74:312–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bouamama H, Noel T, Villard J, Benharref A, Jana M. Antimicrobial activities of the leaf extract of two Moroccan Cistus L species. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;104:104–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Arora DS, Kaur GJ. Antibacterial activity of some Indian medicinal plants. J Nat Med. 2007;61:313–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Velioglu YS, Mazza G, Gao L, Oomah BD. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits vegetables and grain products. J Agric food chem. 1998;46:4113–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Yi-Fang C, Jie S, Xian-Hong WU, Rui-Hai L. Antioxidant and Antiproferative activities of commom vegetables. Rev J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:6910–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Arouma OI. Methodological considerations for characterizing potential antioxidant actions of bioactive components in food plants. Mut Res. 2003;523:9–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Isah T, Mujib A. In vitro plant regeneration of coffee senna (Sennaoccidentalis) from hypocotyl-derived callus. ActaBiologicaCracoviensia. 2013;55(2):120–5.Google Scholar
Sharma N, Trikha P, Athar M, Raisuddin S. In vitro inhibition of carcinogen-induced mutagenicity by Cassia occidentalisand Emblicaofficinalis. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2000;23:477–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Vashishtha VM, John TJ, Kumar A. Clinical and pathological features of acute toxicity due to Cassia occidentalisin vertebrates. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130:23–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Yadav JP, Arya V, Yadav S, Panghal M, Kumar S, Dhankhar S. Cassia occidentalis: A review on its ethnobotany, phytochemical and pharmacological process. Fitoterapia. 2009;81:223–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Tona L, Mesia K, Ngimbi NP, Chrimwami B, Okond’ahoka CK, de Bruyne T, et al. In vivo antimalarial activity of Cassia occidentalis, Morindamorindoides and Phyllanthusniruri. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2001;95:47–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kayina A, Reddy GSN. Effect of organic manures, biofertilizers and inorganic fertilizers on growth and yield of senna (Cassia angustifoliavahl.). Life Sciences leaflets. 2012;6:35–41. doi:http://lifesciencesleaflets.ning.com/.Google Scholar
Tasaka AC, Weg R, Calore EE, Sinhorini IL, Dagli MLZ, Haragudri M, et al. Toxicity testing of senna occidentalis seed in rabbits. Vet Res Comm. 2000;24:573–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Yadav JP, Arya V, Yadav S, Panghal M, Kumar S, Dhankhar S. Cassia occidentalis: A review on its ethnobotany, phytochemical and pharmacological process. Fitoterapia. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.fitote.2009.09.008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sofowara A. Medicinal plants and Traditional medicine in Africa. Ibadan, Nigeria: Spectrum Book LTD; 1993. p. 289.Google Scholar
Herborne JB. Phytochemical methods. 3rd ed. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd; 1973. p. 135–203.Google Scholar
Okwu DE. Evaluation of the chemical composition of indigenous species and flouvoring agents. Global J Pure Appl sci. 2001;7(3):455–9.Google Scholar
Rahilla TN, Rukh S, Ziaidi AA. Phytochemical screening of medicinal plants belonging to Euphorbiaceae Pak. Vet J. 1994;14(1994):160–2.Google Scholar
Nabavi SM, Ebrahimzadeh MA Abavi SF, Hamidinia A, Bekhradnia AR. Determination of antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoids content on parrotiapersicamey. Pharmacol online. 2008;2:560–7.Google Scholar
Nabavi SM, Ebrahimzadeh MA, Nabavi SF, Jafari M. Free radical scavenging activity and antioxidant capacity of Eryngium cancasicumTrantv and Froripia subpinnata. Pharmacol online. 2008;3:19–25.Google Scholar
Shimbe RY, Tor-Anyiin TA. phytochemical and antibacterial studies of hymenocardia acida roots. J Chem Soc Nigeria. 2014;39(2):119–22.Google Scholar

Copyright

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.