Skip to main content

International Journal of Phytomedicine and Phytotherapy

Clinical Phytoscience Cover Image

Correlative study of heavy metal content with biological importance of Solanum virginianum leaf extract

Abstract

Background

Rapid urbanization and industrialization have greatly impacted the inherent soil composition. Heavy metals disposed in the environment by anthropogenic activities toxicate flora and ultimately affect the phytochemical profile of medicinal plants. We report here such an investigation of the heavy metal concentrations in the leaf extract of Solanum virginianum (S. virginianum). This work has been extended to observe the phytochemical constituents and antibacterial significance of leaf extracts in methanol and aqueous medium.

Methods

The metal concentration was analysed on ICE 3000 series atomic absorption spectrometer. The antibacterial assessment was carried by disc diffusion technique against three gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and one gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria.

Results

The content of Iron (Fe), Manganese (Mn), Zinc (Zn), and Lead (Pb) were 2.04, 0.47, 0.41, and 0.10 mg/L, respectively. Saponin and coumarin were present in both extracts. Various other phytochemicals like steroids, terpenoid, and flavonoid, were present only in the water extract, while tannin was present only on methanol extract. The methanol and aqueous extracts exhibited their highest inhibition on S. aureus with zones of inhibition of 12 mm and 14 mm, respectively.

Conclusion

The aqueous extract possessed more phytochemicals than the methanol extract, and the aqueous extract exhibited better antibacterial activity. The high Fe content in the leaf extract may suggest its use as an anaemic medicine. Other metal contents are under the WHO range.

Background

Nepal is a beautiful country nestled in the lap of the Himalayas, known for its diversity in mountains, hills, low land, greenery, rituals, tradition, ethnicity, climate, and many more. An untapped source of rich forest products with miraculous plants is its natural gift. The people here largely rely on the traditional use of flora as medicine and have very old practices in so [1, 2]. However with the considerable enhancement in the food processing techniques and the sedentary lifestyle, chronic and degenerative non-communicable diseases are increasing. Since four decades, there has been a global increase in the number of outbreaks in casual diseases [3]. For such poor and developing countries, allopathic medicines are very expensive, and the relatively small group of people in the world have an optimal share with modern medicines [4]. The necessary impetus here is to explore our natural resources and generate the portfolio of the plants with aided scientific studies complementing the traditional uses and promoting the well-being of the people. The direction of herbal drugs is attractive for modern medicine [5]. With modern scientific tools and research designs, the isolation and study of metabolites has become possible and rapid. In treatment of almost every ailment, the share of drugs via natural products is substantial. Even in complicated ailments such as cancer, natural products have a good contribution. In a review of approved drugs for cancer between 1940 and 2014, 175 small molecules were approved, of which 75% were synthetic and 49% were other natural products or their directly derived products [6]. The effectiveness of the medicinal herbs lies in the phytochemicals present, which exhibit specific as well as diverse physiological actions. Phytochemicals are synthesized by plants to protect them against bacterial, fungal, viral, and free-radical damage [7]. Such secondary metabolites perform various functions in living systems, most of which are conducive to healthy living. Flavonoids, phenolic acids, and tannins are polyphenolic compounds offering significant advantages, including anti-aging, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant, and even prevent the development of long-term diabetes complications. Alkaloids, terpenoids, and polyphenols are known for their antibacterial activities [8,9,10].

Most pharmacological procedures and treatments are dependent on antibiotics. The unradical use and inadequate synthesis of the new class of antibiotics have put entire chemotherapy at risk due to the rapid growth of superbugs. From development to approval of new antibiotics, only through synthesis is a very lengthy and daunting task. Plants are very attractive alternatives. To date, more than 1000 plant extracts have shown promising activity against several pathogens. Several studies have demonstrated their increased potency when coupled with antibiotics, reducing the uptake of antibiotics [11, 12]. Therefore, investigation of the antibacterial power of every plant is an urgent need. Contamination of drugs with heavy metals can cause adverse effects [13, 14]. Metals like K, Na, Fe, Mn, Mg, and Zn etc. play vital roles in several biochemical processes, and Hg, Cd, Pb, and As, etc. even at trace amounts pose deleterious effects on living systems. Rapid industrialization as well as geologic and anthropogenic activities, often increases the concentration of heavy metals in the soil. Some plants have the power to absorb metals from soil and water, and are efficient at reducing pollution. This technique is being accepted and praised for phytoremediation. Consumption of such plants can inadvertently transfer accumulated metals to body. Although a normal balance of biometals is desired, a higher concentration of essential metals also harms [15,16,17]. Based on the ADI values, the presence of Pb, Cd, and As in dried plant powders less than 10, 0.3, and 1 mg/kg are accepted in herbal medicines [18, 19].

In Nepal, Solanum virginianum L. (family Solanaceae) is waste-land vegetation (Fig. 1). The plant has long been used to treat coughs, asthma, toothache, hair loss, skin diseases, and respiratory diseases [20,21,22]. Secondary metabolites like diosgenin and β-sistosterol were isolated in 1968 [23], Carpesterol in 1971 [24], and 11 more in 1973 [25]. Further, Β2-Solamargine, Solamargine, Solasonine, solasodine, Caffeic acid, oleanolic acid are also reported [26,27,28]. Studies have shown antimicrobial, antiradical, and insecticidal properties of the plant [29]. Steroidal constituents present in the plant have shown potential for tumour cell death. A detailed study on powder plant extracts showed positive results for the treatment of bronchial asthma in hospitalized patients [30]. Furthermore, the fruit has shown hepatoprotective action against CCl4 induced [31] and antitubercular drug-induced [32] liver toxicity in rodents. The leaf extract exhibits good antidiabetic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic rats [33]. The phytochemical evaluation of the whole plant [34] and roots [35] revealed various therapeutically important secondary metabolites to a good extent. Since most of the remedial measures regarding the folklore and traditional use of this plant are supported by various scientific studies, it seems a useful plant.

Fig. 1
figure1

Solanum virginianum plant displaying Leaves and Fruits

S. virginianum upon cultivation is found to efficiently reduces the half-life of carbofuran residues from the soil, thereby do an efficient phytoremedy [36]. According to other studies at due, the heavy metal concentrations determination in plants is urgent. As known that the same plants at different geography could have different compositions of phytochemicals in them. Almost every other study on this plant has been conducted elsewhere. Further, overall studies of this plant have much been focused either only on the fruit part or on the whole plant. Only little studies are available on the roots and leaves. Therefore, the present study is to assess phytochemical screening, heavy metal concentration determination, and antibacterial assessment of the leaf part of the plant.

Methods

Plant collection

The reported plant was collected from the Sundarharaicha municipality of Morang district in province 1, Nepal (26° 40′ 5.53′′ N, 87° 23′ 7.12′′ E) during April 2019 (Fig. 2). It was authenticated from the Department of Botany, Mahendra Morang Adarsh Multiple Campus (Tribhuvan University), Biratnagar. The voucher specimen was deposited in the same department as the herbarium specimen. Healthy and mature plant leaves were selected for this study. The plant leaves were first washed thoroughly with tap water and then with distilled water to remove dust and dirt. The leaves were left to dry in shade under dust free environment to free them from dust and impurities and also to reduce contaminants.

Fig. 2
figure2

Map of Morang district province 1, Nepal, showing study area (green shaded)

Extraction

Extraction for phytochemical screening was carried out via the maceration technique [37]. The leaves were mechanically grinded into a grinder and obtained as powder. 10 g powder plant material in 100 mL triple distilled water was left for about 48 h with frequent stirring and finally centrifuged to obtain the crude extract. Similarly, 10 g powder plant material in 100 mL methanol was stirred overnight, and crude solutions were filtered using Whatman No.1 filter paper and stored in a sterile container at 5 °C for further use.

Heavy metal concentration test

1.0 g dry and powder sample was taken in a 250 mL conical flask. 10 mL conc.HNO3 was added to it and the mixture was evaporated on a hot plate untill the brown fumes disappeared. The digested sample was dissolved in water, and the residue was rejected after filtration. It was then poured into a 100 ml of volumetric flask. The volume was made 100 mL by adding triple distilled water [38]. The quantification of metals in plant extracts was done by flame AAS technique outfitted in ICE 3000 series atomic absorption spectrometer at Nepal Batawaraniya Sewa Kendra Biratnagar.

Preliminary phytochemical screening

Preliminary phytochemical screening of plant extracts was carried out according to standard procedures [39]. Bioactive compounds were analyzed by chemical tests to detect and validate their presence. Detailed analytical procedures are given in Table 1.

Table 1 Preliminary phytochemical tests for plant extracts

Antibacterial assessment

The antibacterial evaluation of extracts was tested against four clinical strains of bacteria such as E. coli, S. aureus, S. typhi, and P. aeruginosa using the standard Kirby-Bauer paper disc diffusion method with Muller-Hinton’s agar media for bacterial growth [40]. The bacterial pathogens were collected in 2 ml tryptone soya broth and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C for better and complete growth. The incubated broth was swabbed over agar media in sterile Petri plates. Sterilized paper discs made of Whatman Paper No. 1 with 5 mm diameter size were first stuck over the media and plant extracts at different concentrations prepared with DMSO were loaded. A plain DMSO disk was used as a negative control and amikacin (30 μg/disc) was used as the standard reference. The Petri plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and the diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured using the antibiogram zone measuring scale [41].

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis of antibacterial data was analysed using Origin 2017 version software program. The statistical results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). We ran one way ANOVA to test level of significance and differences between means were determined by running Tuckey’s test. P values < 0.05 were regarded as significant.

Results

Heavy metal concentration test

The metal concentration in the leaf extract of S. virginianum was determined, and the obtained values are illustrated in Table 2. It shows the presence of high Fe concentration (2.04 mg/L). The concentrations of other metals are Mn (0.47 mg/L), Zn (0.41 mg/L), and Pb (0.10 mg/L). Data reported here are from a single experiment. Metals like Cr, Co, Ni, and Cd were found at very low concentrations (< 0.05 mg/L).

Table 2 Concentration of different heavy metal (mg/L) in a plant sample with WHO Standards

Phytochemical screening

Phytochemical screening revealed the presence of steroids, terpenoid, flavonoid, glycosides, saponins, coumarin, anthocyanins, and polyphenols in the water extract. Each test was conducted in triplicates for confirmation. Tannin was only observed in methanol extract, while saponin was found in both methanol and aqueous extracts. Alkaloids, carbohydrates, proteins, emodols, and glucosides were absent in both extracts. The phytochemical results are illustrated in Table 3.

Table 3 Phytochemical results of S. virginianum in methanol and aqueous extract

Antibacterial assessment

The values of the diameter of the zone of inhibition of the tested bacterial pathogens at two different concentrations of extracts (100 μg/μL and 50 μg/μL) are tabulated in Table 4, and the graphical interpretation of the data is presented in Fig. 3-4. The growth inhibition zone values of both extracts were quite similar and low, revealing the considerable antibacterial potency of plant leaves for the tested organisms. Moreover, growth inhibition was found greater for P. aeruginosa (p < 0.05) comparing with growth inhibition zone of E. coli as standard. The means comparison plot of antibacterial data performed by Tuckey’s test for different concentrations of extracts is presented in Fig. 5a-d.

Table 4 Antibacterial growth inhibition data
Fig. 3
figure3

Bar graph of antibacterial sensitivity of leaf extract at 100 μg/μL concentration

Fig. 4
figure4

Bar graph of antibacterial sensitivity of leaf extract at 50 μg/μL concentration

Fig. 5
figure5

Mean comparison plot of antibacterial data by Tukey’s test for (a) 100 μg/μL in Methanol (b) 50 μg/μL in Methanol (c) 100 μg/μL in H2O (d) 50 μg/μL in H2O

Discussion

The concentrations of metals exhibited patterns as Fe > Mn > Zn > Pb > Cr, Co, Ni, and Cd. The values indicate that all metal concentrations are below the threshold marked by the WHO. The standard value of Fe content in the plant has not been established; however, the concentration of Fe (2.04 mg/L) is far more than the concentration of Cd. It has been found that high concentrations of Cd in plants cause a decrease in Fe concentrations [42].. The comparative data of Fe suggests good plant metabolism. Similarly Mn, another essential element, is useful in various metabolic processes like photosynthesis, respiration, and nitrogen assimilation, etc. The value of Mn (0.47 mg/L) suggests that it has accumulated in plant parts by the use of acid-facilitating fertilizers [43]. The presence of Zn in plant parts reveals nothing extraordinary as it is an essential constituent of plant useful in metabolic and enzymatic processes [44]. The concentration of lead (0.10 mg/L) is relatively low in comparison with the threshold value provided by WHO standards (10.0), but it must be taken under consideration that the air expellant system of several industries, fuel combustion of vehicles expelled lead in air, which may be deposited on the leaf. A similar study in the same plant collected from different places in Pakistan reported a comparatively higher content of Zn, Cd, Pb, and Fe compared to those metals reported in this study [34]. Co, Ni, and Cr are all trace metals found low in concentration than their relative standards; however, the concentration might vary from site to site. The accumulation of pollutants from various sources through air, soil, water, etc. plays an important role in the buildup of metals in the plant.

The phytochemical screening results showed a significant extraction of chemicals by water (~ 13% yield) over methanol (~ 8% yield). It is interesting to report six chemicals, viz. steroids, terpenoid, flavonoid, glycosides, anthocyanins and phenols that were detected only on the aqueous extract of leaf. Glucoside, carbohydrate, emodol, protein, and alkaloids were absent in both extracts of the leaf part of S. virginianum, as shown in Table 3. In the root extract of the same plant, alkaloids and flavonoids were found in both extracts, while glycosides were not reported at all. In a whole plant study conducted in Pakistan, alkaloids, saponins, and flavonoids were found to a good extent [35]. But with plants collected from three different places of Pakistan, crude alkaloids present are 9.4%, 7.6%, and 2.4% [34]. This variance shows the effect of environmental conditions on the yield of phytochemicals. According to Lin et al. (2016), phenolic compounds are usually associated with defence responses in plants. Therefore, we can say that plants produce phytochemicals as per their need to respond to stimuli imposed by the environment [9]. These phytochemicals are very important because of their usefulness in a number of complex systems. With no claim of completeness, we report here the uses of phytochemicals present in the leaves of S. virginianum. Tannin has a tendency to play an important role as a natural corrosion inhibitor [45] and antifungal agents [46]. Saponin is widely used as an antifungal agent, insecticidal, antihelminthic, and anti-inflammatory agents [47]. Terpenoids bearing constituents are used as antibacterial, antimicrobial, antitumor, anti-inflammatory [48], and natural products for anticancer therapy [49]. Coumarin has been found to play a significant role as an antioxidant agent in mammalian cells [50, 51]. Phenol-bearing compounds have efficient antipyretic and analgesic activities [52]. Anthocyanin and its metabolites have a broad use as therapeutic agents [53]. All the phytochemical components suggest that S. virginianum would be fruitful for humans as different agents under proper conditions if applied. No adverse effects were reported in patients with mild to moderate asthmatic symptoms during a study administering 300 mg of powdered areal part of S. verginianum per day, but patients greatly improved after the 3rd day [30].

The in vitro antibacterial sensitivity against three clinical strains of gram-negative bacterias (E. coli, S. typhi, P. aeruginosa) and one-gram positive bacteria (S. aureus) were studied at two different concentrations (100 and 50 μg/μL). The diameter of the zone of inhibition in Figs. 2 and 3 suggested a lower antibacterial activity than that of the control drug. These inhibition data exhibited the justifiable efficiency of the extracts against the pathogens [11]. The non-involvement of the solvent was evidenced by the nil inhibition data of DMSO. The extracts in two different media exposed significant variation of antibacterial properties with the greater in vitro effect of the aqueous extract, and as such, the presence of phytochemicals differed. The phytochemicals are organic compounds which have several donor atoms to provide binding site for cell components of organisms and show their antibacterial activity. The phytochemicals also have capacity to form temporary complex when metal ions approach to it. With this phenomenon, the lipophilicity of complex for target nuclear materials (RNA) of organisms goes enhanced which may be the cause of enhanced antibacterial sensitivity [54]. The aqueous extracts possess most of the phytochemicals and metals in good ratio, because of which we observed increased antibacterial sensitivity relative to methanol extract. From this data, we can surely claim that the antibacterial activity of plant extracts is due to the combined effect of different phytochemicals rather than a single unit. And that the studies involving various solvent media have their significance, and should be planned with significant differences in polarity.

Conclusion

The key point of this study is the metal concentration determination, and the study plays an imperative role in forming an image by comparing similar statistics with other research. Nepal is a developing country that cannot afford a high and facilitated extent of research due to various restrictions, and we are far off the development of FDA-approvable drugs comprising extensive studies. Therefore, the documentation of our traditional medicines with the exploration of unexamined natural products is the current necessity. Phytochemical examination showed that S. virginianum leaf extract contained a blend of phytochemicals like steroids, terpenoid, flavonoid, glycosides, coumarin, and anthocyanins etc., and possessed satisfactory antibacterial activity. The study of metal concentration revealed the present level of metals below the alarming range. It is an important pollution indicator and needs frequent inquiry.

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated and analyzed during the study are included in the manuscript and are available for the readers.

Abbreviations

WHO:

World Health Organization

AAS:

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy

ADI:

Acceptable daily intake

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

DMSO:

Dimethyl Sulphoxide

References

  1. 1.

    Adhikari M, Thapa R, Kunwar RM, Devkota HP, Poudel P. Ethnomedicinal uses of plant resources in the Machhapuchchhre rural municipality of Kaski district, Nepal. Medicines. 2019;6(69). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines6020069.

  2. 2.

    Shrestha N, Shrestha S, Koju L, Shrestha KK, Wang Z. Medicinal plant diversity and traditional healing practices in eastern Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;192:292–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.07.067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Smith KF, Goldberg M, Rosenthal S, Carlson L, Chen J, Chen C, Ramachandran S. Global rise in human infectious disease outbreaks. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0950.

  4. 4.

    Sudhir H, Torwane NA, Pankaj G, Chandrashekhar BR, Gouraha A. Role of Unani system of medicine in management of orofacial diseases : a review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(10):ZE12–5. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/8335.5018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mosihuzzaman M. Herbal medicine in healthcare-an overview. Nat Prod Commun. 2012;7(6):807–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578x1200700628.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J Nat Prod. 2016;79:629–61. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01055.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Othman L, Sleiman A, Abdel-Massih RM. Antimicrobial activity of polyphenols and alkaloids in middle eastern plants. Front Microbiol. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00911.

  8. 8.

    Barbieri R, Coppo E, Marchese A, Daglia M, Sobarzo-Sánchez E, Nabavi SF, Nabavi SM. Phytochemicals for human disease: an update on plant-derived compounds antibacterial activity. Microbiol Res. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2016.12.003.

  9. 9.

    Lin D, Xiao M, Zhao J, Li Z, Xing B, Li X, Kong M, Li L, Zhang Q, Liu Y, Chen H, Qin W, Wu H, Chen S. An overview of plant phenolic compounds and their importance in human nutrition and management of type 2 diabetes. Molecules. 2016;21. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101374.

  10. 10.

    Tungmunnithum D, Thongboonyou A, Pholboon A, Yangsabai A. Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds from medicinal plants for pharmaceutical and medical aspects : an overview. Medicines. 2018;5. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5030093.

  11. 11.

    Coates AR, Halls G, Hu Y. Novel classes of antibiotics or more of the same ? Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163:184–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01250.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Alanis AJ. Resistance to antibiotics : are we in the post-antibiotic era ? Arch Med Res. 2005;36:697–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.06.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    WHO guidelines on safety monitoring of herbal medicines in pharmacovigilance systems. 2004.

  14. 14.

    Najmi AK, Pillai KK, Pal SN, Akhtar M, Mujeeb M, Aftab A. Neuropharmacological safety evaluation of jigrine: a polyherbal hepatoprotective formulation. J Pharm BioAllied Sci. 2010;2:329–32. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.72134.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tangahu BV, Sheikh Abdullah SR, Basri H, Idris M, Anuar N, Mukhlisin M. A review on heavy metals (as, Pb, and hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int J Chem Eng. 2011;2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/939161.

  16. 16.

    Alam M, Khan M, Khan A, Zeb S, Khan MA, Amin N u, Sajid M, Abdul Mateen K. Concentrations, dietary exposure, and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in market vegetables of Peshawar, Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess. 2018;190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6881-2.

  17. 17.

    Chibuike GU, Obiora SC. Heavy metal polluted soils : effect on plants and bioremediation methods, vol. 2014; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/752708.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    World Health Organisation. Quality control methods for medicinal plant materials World Health Organization Geneva. 1998; https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/41986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Stanojkovic-Sebic A, Pivic R, Josic D, Dinic Z, Stanojkovic A. Heavy metals content in selected medicinal plants commonly used as components for herbal formulations. J Agric Sci. 2015;21:317–25.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tripathi M, Sikarwar RLS. Some traditional herbal formulations of Chitrakoot region, Madhya Pradesh. India Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2013;12:315–20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Paul R, Datta AK. An updated overview on Solanum xanthocaprum schrad and wendl. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm. 2013;2:730–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Govindan S, Viswanathan S, Vijayasekaranz V, Alagappan R. A pilot study on the clinical efficacy of Solanum xanthocarpum and Solanum trilobatum in bronchial asthma. J Ethnopharmacol 1999;66:205–210. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00160-3.

  23. 23.

    Heble MR, Narayanaswami S, Chadha MS. Diosgenin and beta-Sitosterol: isolation from Solanum xanthocarpum tissue cultures. Science. 1968;161(3846):1145. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.161.3846.1145.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Beisler JA, Sato Y. The chemistry of carpesterol, a novel sterol from Solanum xanthocarpum. J Organomet Chem. 1971;36(25):3946–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00824a022.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kusano G, Beisler J, Sato Y. Steroidal constituents of Solanum xanthocarpum. Phytochemistry. 1973;12:397–401.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nithya M, Ragavendran C, Natarajan D. Antibacterial and free radical scavenging activity of a medicinal plant Solanum xanthocarpum. Int J Food Prop. 2018;21(1):313–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2017.1409236.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bhutani KK, Paul AT, Fayad W, Linder S. Apoptosis inducing activity of steroidal constituents from Solanum xanthocarpum and Asparagus racemosus. Phytomedicine. 2010;17:789–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2010.01.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Upadhye AS, Kumbhalkar BB, Deshpande AS. Macro-microscopic evaluation and HPTLC-densitometric analysis of solasodine from fruits of some medicinally important species in genus Solanum Linn. Indian J Nat Prod Resour. 2012;3:166–72.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Prashith Kekuda TR, Raghavendra HL, Rajesh MR, Avinash HC, Ankith GN, Karthik KN. Antimicrobial, insecticidal, and antiradical activity of Solanum virginianum l. (solanaceae). Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017;10:163–7. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i11.20180.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Govindan S, Viswanathan S, Vijayasekaranz V, Alagappan R. Further studies on the clinical efficacy of Solanum xanthocarpum and Solanum trilobatum in bronchial asthma. Phyther Res. 2004;18:805–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1555.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gupta RK, Hussain T, Panigrahi G, Das A, Singh GN, Sweety K, Md F, Rao CV. Hepatoprotective effect of Solanum xanthocarpum fruit extract against CCl4 induced acute liver toxicity in experimental animals. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2011;4:964–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1995-7645(11)60227-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hussain T, Gupta R, Sweety K, Khan MS, Hussain MS, Arif M, Hussain A, Faiyazuddin M, Rao. CV. Evaluation of antihepatotoxic potential of Solanum xanthocarpum fruit extract against antitubercular drugs induced hepatopathy in experimental rodents. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2(6):454–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60075-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Poongothai K, Ponmurugan P, Ahmed KSZ, Kumar BS, Sheriff SA. Antihyperglycemic and antioxidant effects of Solanum xanthocarpum leaves (field grown & in vitro raised) extracts on alloxan induced diabetic rats. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2011;4(10):778–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1995-7645(11)60193-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hussain I, Rehman S. Ur, Amin R, Khan FU, Chishti KA. Phytochemical composition and heavy metals contents of Xanthium stramarium and Solanum xanthocarpum. World Appl Sci J. 2010;10(3):294–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kumar S, Sharma UK, Sharma AK, Pandey AK. Protective efficacy of Solanum xanthocarpum root extracts against free radical damage: phytochemical analysis and antioxidant effect. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2012;58(1):174–81. https://doi.org/10.1170/T938.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Teerakun M, Reungsang A, Virojanakud W. Phytoremediation of carbofuran residues in soil. Environ Hazardous Manag. 2004;26.

  37. 37.

    Zhang QW, Lin LG, Ye WC. Techniques for extraction and isolation of natural products : a comprehensive review. Chin Med. 2018;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-018-0177-x.

  38. 38.

    Artwell K, France N, Florence K. Investigation of some metals in leaves and leaf extracts of Lippia javanica: its daily intake. J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1476328.

  39. 39.

    Phuyal A, Ojha PK, Guragain B, Chaudhary NK. Phytochemical screening, metal concentration determination, antioxidant activity, and antibacterial evaluation of Drymaria diandra plant. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2019;8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-019-0020-1.

  40. 40.

    Jenkins SG, Schuetz AN. Current concepts in laboratory testing to guide antimicrobial therapy. Clin Proc. 2012;87(3):290–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.01.007.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Subba B, Srivastav C, Kandel RC. Scientific validation of medicinal plants used by Yakkha community of Chanuwa VDC, Dhankuta, Nepal. Springerplus. 2016;5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1821-5.

  42. 42.

    Morrissey J, Guerinot ML. Iron uptake and transport in plants : the good , the bad , and the ionome. Chem Rev. 2009;109(10):4553–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900112r.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    El-Jaoual T, Cox DA. Manganese toxicity in plants. J Plant Nutr. 1998;21(2):353–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169809365409.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Adie GU, Adekunle A. Evaluation of potentially toxic metal contamination of local medicinal plants and extracts sold in Ibadan, Nigeria. J Heal Pollut. 2017;7(14):23–9. https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-7.14.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nardeli JV, Fugivara CS, Taryba M, Pinto ERP, Montemor MF, Benedetti AV. Tannin: a natural corrosion inhibitor for aluminum alloys. Prog Org Coat. 2019;135:368–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.05.035.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Latté KP, Kolodziej H. Antifungal effects of hydrolysable tannins and related compounds on dermatophytes, mould fungi and yeasts. Z Naturforsch C. 2000;55:467–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2000-5-625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Marrelli M, Conforti F, Araniti F, Statti G. Effects of saponins on lipid metabolism: a review of potential health benefits in the treatment of obesity. Molecules. 2016;21(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101404.

  48. 48.

    Prakash V. Terpenoids as source of anti-inflammatory compounds. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017;10(3):68–76. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i3.16435.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Huang M, Lu JJ, Huang MQ, Bao JL, Chen XP, Wang YT. Terpenoids: natural products for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2012;21(12):1801–18. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.2012.727395.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kostova I, Bhatia S, Grigorov P, Balkansky S, Parmar VS, Prasad AK, Saso L. Coumarins as antioxidants. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(25):3929–51. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986711803414395.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Al-Amiery AA, Al-Majedy YK, Kadhum AAH, Mohamad AB. Novel macromolecules derived from coumarin: synthesis and antioxidant activity. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):11825. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11825.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hegazi NM, Sobeh M, Rezq S, El-Raey MA, Dmirieh M, El-Shazly AM, Mahmoud MF, Wink M. Characterization of phenolic compounds from Eugenia supra-axillaris leaf extract using HPLC-PDA-MS/MS and its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic and pain killing activities in vivo. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46946-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Winter AN, Bickford PC. Anthocyanins and their metabolites as therapeutic agents for neurodegenerative disease. Antioxidants. 2019;8(9):333. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8090333.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Singh K, Kumar Y, Puri P, Sharma C, Aneja KR. Metal-based biologically active compounds: synthesis, spectral, and antimicrobial studies of cobalt, nickel, copper, and zinc complexes of triazole-derived Schiff bases. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2011;2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/901716.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Laboratory head Prof. P. Mishra of Bio-inorganic and Materials Chemistry Research Laboratory to provide space for conducting this research. We are also grateful to the Department of Chemistry, MMAMC Biratnagar for providing necessary chemicals to pursue the research work.

Funding

This study has no funding.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BG and KM performed the study. BG and SB prepared manuscript. NKC supervised the work and finalize manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narendra Kumar Chaudhary.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guragain, B., Pant, K.R., Bhattarai, S. et al. Correlative study of heavy metal content with biological importance of Solanum virginianum leaf extract. Clin Phytosci 6, 81 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40816-020-00229-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • S. virginianum
  • Plant extract
  • Heavy metals
  • Phytochemicals
  • Antibacterial evaluation