Skip to main content

International Journal of Phytomedicine and Phytotherapy

Evaluation of clinical trials of the plants, which have ethnobotanical uses for skin disorders in Turkey: a review

Abstract

Background

Ethnobotanical studies investigating a large number of traditional herbs and uses have an important role in the discovery of new drugs. Nowadays, some of these traditional herbs are researched directly in the clinical trials. In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the 19 plant species that have been identified in the clinical trials among 300 plant species belonging to 79 families with traditional use for skin problems in Turkey.

Main body

Natural sources are very important to treat diseases for thousands of years. The ethnopharmacological research of natural products ranges from the collection of biogenic samples such as plants to preclinical and clinical studies with the aim of developing drug templates or new drugs. In the ethnopharmacological approach, it is aimed to reach the result based on the traditional and modern knowledge about natural resources. The biggest advantage of this approach is synthesizing new and old information. After the plant or natural compound is determined, other processes work similarly with conventional drugs.

Methods

Ethnobotanical papers, thesis and projects in Istanbul University Faculty of Pharmacy Department of Pharmaceutical Botany and databases (PubMed and Google Scholar) have been sought and results were synthesized.

Results

Most of the clinical uses of herbs have been seen similar to their traditional uses. On the other hand, there are some plants on which their clinical uses differ from the traditional uses such as Borago officinalis, Calendula officinalis or Euphorbia peplus. When the frequency of traditional uses of herbs are compared, Plantago species, Plantago major and Plantago lanceolata are the most used taxa in Turkey, secondly, Hypericum perforatum comes. However, Plantago species are not of much interest in clinical trials. It is seen that most of the plants in the clinical research are tried for wound healing occuring due to different origins such as cancer, surgery and injury.

Side effects were observed only during the application of Allium cepa, Cydonia oblonga and H. perforatum.

Conclusions

When clinical trials are evaluated in terms of efficacy and overall results, significant differences and effective results are seen in treatment groups given herbs in comparison with placebo or control groups.

Introduction

Numerous investigations depend on ethnopharmacological approaches have been carried out about medicinal plants and their bioactive compounds via using various different concepts and methods. These multidisciplinary researches concerned with the observation, description and experimental investigations are ranging from anthropology to various fields such as pharmaceutical botany, pharmacognosy, pharmacology, natural product chemistry, toxicology, pharmaceutics, clinical research, and molecular biology [1].

The best known modern drugs such as morphine, codeine, papaverine (Papaver somniferum L.), atropin (Atropa belladonna L.), quinine (Cinchona succirubra Pav), colchicine (Colchicum autumnale L.) and digitalis glycosides (Digitalis purpurea L.) were discovered at the end of these studies.

As an interesting example, it is also listed in our article, the species of Euphorbia peplus L (garden spurge or petty spurge) which is traditionally used for a number of skin problems like warts could be a novel anticancer agent for skin cancers in future [2].

The skin is the largest sensory and contact organ in the human body. It is composed of two layers: the epidermis and the dermis. The skin serves not only to protect the body from the external environment but also to prevent loss of water from the body. The outermost layer of the skin, the stratum corneum, acts as the primary permeability barrier [3].

There are many types of skin conditions that have a tremendous impact on human health and quality of life, including acne, psoriasis, dermatitis, chronic wounds, and infections. The majority of these skin diseases could be treated topically as shown in Table 1, thereby avoiding the potential for systemic side effects [4, 5].

Table 1 Common skin disorders and existing topical treatment options

In addition to the above mentioned first-line therapies, there has been a resurgence of the use of ethnobotanical remedies in recent years. Herbal therapies have been tried for the treatment of skin conditions for centuries in the world. Many plants and their extracts have been used traditionally for the management and treatment of various skin disorders. The aim of this paper is to compare the traditional uses of Turkey’s wild plants which are used by local people for the treatment of skin disorders with their clinical trials.

Methods

The study consists of two stages, screening of ethnobotanical studies and determination of plants tried in clinical studies for skin problems. In the evaluation, firstly their suitability for traditional use was reviewed in detail. Then, clinical studies were evaluated according to the criteria of Patient population, Design, and Intervention, Outcomes, Efficacy and Safety/ Tolerability.

We assessed the significance of the results of clinical trials with p-value (p < 0.05 values are significant) and the healing percentage (complete healing is significant). The study includes randomized, non-randomized, double-blinded, single-blinded, non-blinded, and placebo-controlled clinical studies. However, non-randomized and non-blinded studies can give us limited results.

All documents have been sought on Pubmed and Google Scholar, thesis and projects in IU Faculty of Pharmacy Department of Pharmaceutical Botany.

Results and discussion

A total of 300 medicinal plants belonging to 79 families have been compiled from the research areas in Turkey as shown in Table 2. The family Asteraceae, in the first rank, is the largest family which includes the most species in the world and Turkey. Although the family Lamiaceae, in the second, is not the second largest family in Turkey, it has very important medicinal and aromatic plants in the Mediterranean phytogeographic area.

Table 2 Families and species of the plants are compiled from research areas

Considering the species, it could be to evaluate Plantago species, P. major and P. lanceolata, which are first in the most used taxa ranking, as the same plant. Because these species are used with a similar name and in a similar way without distinguishing. Then, H. perforatum comes as one of the most used species for skin problems in Turkey.

In the following table, 19 plant species on which their clinical studies are arranged alphabetically. The botanical names are followed by the family names, a Turkish name, traditional uses, and differentiations between clinical and traditional uses of 19 plants as shown in Table 3. In the last part, these clinical studies are summarized as shown in Table 4.

Table 3 Traditional uses of the plants for skin problems in Turkey
Table 4 Clinical trials of the traditional plants used for skin problems in Turkey

Especially, when we compare the healing efficacy of herbs or their mixtures considering complete healing response, p values, and methods, these could be more effective than others for their special clinical uses of skin disorders: Ankaferd Blood Stopper (Vitis vinifera, Urtica dioica, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Alpinia officinarum, Thymus vulgaris), Calendula officinalis and H. perforatum. Additionally, we have known that these herbs have been used by Turkish traditional medicine for many years. Unfortunately, all herbs we searched have very limited clinical trials and therefore it is hard to compare and understand their efficacy and side effects for longterm clinical uses [35, 36]. Hence, we propose to increase the number of clinical trials because of these reasons.

The clinical trials of the plants listed in Table 4 are different from each other, that’s why the evaluation of these studies was done within some rules. The most important of these rules is the evidence hierarchy, when the data contradict each other. Therefore, the results of the meta-analysis are strongest evidence, when there is any contradiction. However, in some cases, the results of the retrospective studies could be also very important, even though they represent weak evidence [62]. Meta-analysis and randomized controlled trials are at the top of the evidence pyramid, while the case reports and expert opinions are at the bottom of the evidence pyramid. The best evidence is quality, while considering these studies. The quality of evidence increases as it goes from bottom to top [63]. Randomization provides epidemiologically the highest quality data. When randomization is not appropriate for various reasons, researchers may be required to rely on non-randomized studies. In randomized studies, performing blind study is to prevent taking sides. In the single-blind studies, only researchers or patients are not aware of the drug, while both patients and researchers do not know which drug is given to which group in the double-blind studies. These studies are among the valuable studies in the evidence pyramid.

As the technique and technology in the field of medicine advance, research on the use of herbs in diseases may differ over the centuries. For example, Sambucus ebulus L. has been used for different ailments including: joint pains, cold, wounds, and infections. Nevertheless, recent evidence has revealed its potential for making attempts at treating cancer and metabolic disorders [64]. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive information of herbs regarding their traditional uses and modern findings which may contribute to the development of novel natural-based therapeutic agents.

Conclusions

Most of the uses of herbs studied in the clinical trials appear to be similar to their traditional uses. Many products prepared from these plants are sold in the market. However, there are some plants on which their clinical uses differ from the traditional uses. As shown in Table 3, these are: A. sativum, Borago officinalis, Calendula officinalis, Euphorbia peplus, Ficus carica, Foeniculum vulgare, Melissa officinalis, Myrtus communis, Rosmarinus officinalis and Urtica dioica.

As evident from Table 4, wound healing is the investigated mostly issue in clinical studies with traditional herbs. Because, skin wounds, either acute or chronic, might affect the quality of patients’ life significantly. Especially, chronic wounds might be progressive and resistant to treatments. These wounds become chronic because of a number of underlying conditions such as diabetes, vascular disease, and neuropathy [65,66,67]. Herbs studied clinically for general wound healing are: Alkanna tinctoria, Allium cepa, H. perforatum, Achillea millefolium/H. perforatum and H. perforatum/Calendula arvensis. Some studies have been also made in specific areas, these are: for episiotomy or caesarean section wounds with Lavandula stoechas, Achillea millefolium/H. perforatum and H. perforatum/Calendula arvensis combinations; for undergoing transradial catheterization and tonsillectomy with Vitis vinifera/Urtica dioica/Glycyrrhiza glabra/Alpinia officinarum/Thymus vulgaris; for skin ulcer caused by punch biopsy with Cydonia oblonga.

Oncology is another important area where clinical studies with herbs have been carried out frequently. Although there is not much direct use of herbs in cancer treatment, they have been generally tried for the side effects of cancer treatment. However, an example of a clinical study can be given as follows, even if it is not used for this purpose in Turkey: Euphorbia peplus was tried directly for basal cell carcinoma, intraepidermal carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma in Phase I/II clinical study [2]. Some herbs, such as the use of Calendula officinalis for radiotherapy or lumpectomy or mastectomy wounds, have also been tried to prevent skin problems that may develop due to cancer treatment [41, 42]. Another example, Pistacia terebinthus was tried in metastatic colorectal patients who developed skin toxicity while receiving first-line cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy [57].

Other skin diseases and plants that have been studied clinically are as follows: for atopic dermatitis: Borago officinalis, Ficus carica and H. perforatum, for diabetic foot ulcers adequate glycemic control, neuropathic ulcers: Calendula officinalis and Olea europaea; for epithelialization in venous ulcers: A. sativum/H. perforatum/Calendula officinalis combinations, for protective effects: Rosmarinus officinalis, Calendula officinalis or protection mild erythema Olea europaea/Helianthus annuus, for anterior epistaxis: Vitis vinifera/Urtica dioica/Glycyrrhiza glabra/Alpinia officinarum/ Thymus vulgaris, for idiopathic hirsutism localized to the face: Foeniculum vulgare, for symmetrical plaque-type psoriasis: H. perforatum, for acne: M. communis, for recurrent herpes labialis: M. officinalis. In addition, most of these herbs have been found to be statistically effective in their studies as shown in Table 4.

As a result, ethnobotanical studies could have an important role in the discovery of new drugs. Turkish traditional herbs learned from these studies have been used for various diseases locally, but more preclinical and clinical studies are needed to prove the clinical efficacy of these herbs and their compounds.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

DB:

Double blind

NI:

Non-intervention

PBO:

Placebo

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

SB:

Single blind

References

  1. 1.

    Heinrich M, Edward S, Moerman DE, Leonti M. Ethnopharmacological field studies: a critical assessment of their conceptual basis and methods. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;124(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2009.03.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ramsay JR, Suhrbier A, Aylward JH, Ogbourne S, Cozzi SJ, Poulsen MG, et al. The sap from Euphorbia peplus is effective against human nonmelanoma skin cancers. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164(3):633–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10184.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Williams AC. Skin Structure, Function, and Permeation. In: Benson HA, Watkinson AC, editors. Transdermal and topical drug delivery: principles and practice. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012. p. 3-22. 

  4. 4.

    Hajar T, Gontijo JRV, Hanifin JM. New and developing therapies for atopic dermatitis. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;93(1):104–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20187682.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hoffmann J, Gendrisch F, Schempp CM, Wölfle U. New herbal biomedicines for the topical treatment of dermatological disorders. Biomedicines. 2020;8(2):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8020027.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ugulu I, Baslar S, Yorek N, Dogan Y. The investigation and quantitative ethnobotanical evaluation of medicinal plants used around Izmir province. Turkey J Med Plant Res. 2009;3:345–67.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fakir H, Korkmaz M, Güller B. Medicinal plant diversity of Western Mediterranean region in Turkey. JABS. 2009;3:30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tetik F, Civelek S, Cakilcioglu U. Traditional uses of some medicinal plants in Malatya (Turkey). J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;146(1):331–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.12.054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ezer N, Arısan O. Folk Medicines in Merzifon (Amasya, Turkey). Turk J Bot. 2006;30:223–30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Oztürk M, Dinc M. Nizip (Aksaray) Bölgesinin Etnobotanik Özellikleri. Ot Sist Bot Dergisi. 2005;12:93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sezik E, Yesilada E, Honda G, Takaishi Y, Takeda Y, Tanaka T. Traditional medicine in Turkey X. folk medicine in Central Anatolia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;75(2-3):95–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00399-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ugurlu E, Secmen O. Medicinal plants popularly used in the villages of Yunt Mountain (Manisa-Turkey). Fitoterapia. 2008;79(2):126–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2007.07.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yazıcıoğlu E. Trabzon ilinde ilaç ve gıda olarak kullanılan bitkiler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Farmasötik Botanik Bilim Dalı; 1993 (in Turkish). Erişim adresi https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp.

  14. 14.

    Bulut-Emre G. Bayramiç (Çanakkale) yöresinde etnobotanik araştırmalar. Marmara Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Farmasötik Botanik Anabilim Dalı: Doktora Tezi; 2008 (in Turkish). Erişim adresi https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=bejRtUKkoxvH5S3n5trWfw&no=hBZapR3SKmeSxWReALSmIg

  15. 15.

    Kultur S. Medicinal plants used in Kırklareli province (Turkey). J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;111(2):341–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.11.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Keklik T. Konya ili halk ilaçları. Yüksek Lisans Tezi: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Farmakognozi Anabilim Dalı; 1990 (in Turkish). Erişim adresi https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp.

  17. 17.

    Türkan S, Malyer H, Özaydın S, Tumen G. Ordu İli ve Çevresinde Yetişen Bazı Bitkilerin Etnobotanik Özellikleri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2009;10:162–6 (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Demirci S, Özhatay N. Local names of some plants in Andirin, Kahramanmaraş. J Pharm Istanbul Univ. 2012;42:33–42 (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Koçyiğit M. Yalova ilinde etnobotanik bir araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Farmasötik Botanik Anabilim Dalı; 2005 (in Turkish). Erişim adresi https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp.

  20. 20.

    Ecevit G. Çatalca yöresinde etnobotanik bir araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Farmasötik Botanik Anabilim Dalı; 2003 (in Turkish). Erişim adresi https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp.

  21. 21.

    Akgül G. Çıldır (Ardahan) ve Çevresinde Bulunan Bazı Doğal Bitkilerin Yerel Adları ve etnobotanik Özellikleri. Ot Sist Bot Dergisi. 2009;14:75–88 (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Polat R, Satil F. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in Edremit gulf (Balıkesir–Turkey). J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;139(2):626–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tuzlaci E, Aymaz PE. Turkish folk medicinal plants, part IV: Gönen (Balikesir). Fitoterapia. 2001;72(4):323–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(00)00277-X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Akalın E. Tekirdağ ilinde ilaç ve gıda olarak kullanılan yabani bitkiler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Farmasötik Botanik Bilim Dalı; 1993 (in Turkish). Erişim adresi https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp.

  25. 25.

    Tuzlaci E, Tolon E. Turkish folk medicinal plants, part III: Sile (Istanbul). Fitoterapia. 2000;71(6):673–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(00)00234-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kırımca M. Aydın ili halk ilaçları üzerinde farmakognozik ön araştırmalar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Farmakognozi Anabilim Dalı; 1989 (in Turkish). Erişim adresi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

  27. 27.

    Uzun E, Sariyar G, Adsersen A, Karakoc B, Ötük G, Oktayoglu E, et al. Traditional medicine in Sakarya province (Turkey) and antimicrobial activities of selected species. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;95(2-3):287–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.07.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tuzlacı E, Erol MK. Turkish folk medicinal plants. Part II: Eğirdir (Isparta). Fitoterapia. 1999;70(6):593–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(99)00074-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bulut G, Tuzlaci E. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Turgutlu (Manisa-Turkey). J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;149(3):633–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2013.07.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Özuslu E. Sof Dağı (Gaziantep) Yöresindeki Bazı Bitkilerin Etnobotanik Özellikleri ve Mahalli Adları. Kırsal Çevre Yıllığı. Ankara: Kırsal Çevre Ve Ormancılık Sorunları Araştırma Derneği; 2005. p. 7–22. (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Akgul A, Akgul A, Senol SG, Yıldırım H, Secmen O, Dogan Y. An ethnobotanical study in Midyat (Turkey), a city on the silk road where cultures meet. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0201-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Han Mİ. Kadışehri (Yozgat) yöresinin geleneksel halk ilacı olarak kullanılan bitkileri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi: Marmara Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Farmasötik Botanik Anabilim Dalı; 2012 (in Turkish). Erişim adresi https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp.

  33. 33.

    Gürdal B, Kültür S. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Marmaris (Muğla, Turkey). J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;146(1):113–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.12.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kahraman A, Tatlı A. Umurbaba Dağı (Eşme-Uşak) ve çevresindeki bazı bitkilerin Mahalli Adları ve etnobotanik özellikleri. Ot Sist Bot Dergisi. 2004;11:147–54 (in Turkish).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kheiri A, Amini S, Javidan AN, Saghafi MM, Khorasani G. The effects of Alkanna tinctoria Tausch on split-thickness skin graft donor site management: a randomized, blinded placebo-controlled trial. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017;17(1):253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1741-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Song T, Kim KH, Lee KW. Randomised comparison of silicone gel and onion extract gel for post-surgical scars. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(5):702–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2017.1400524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chung VQ, Kelley L, Marra D, Jiang SB. Onion extract gel versus petrolatum emollient on new surgical scars: prospective double-blinded study. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(2):193–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32045.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kundaković T, Milenković M, Zlatković S, Nikolić V, Nikolić G, Binić I. Treatment of venous ulcers with the herbal-based ointment Herbadermal®: a prospective non-randomized pilot study. Forsch Komplementmed. 2012;19(1):26–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000335786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kanehara S, Ohtani T, Uede K, Furukawa F. Clinical effects of undershirts coated with borage oil on children with atopic dermatitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Dermatol. 2007;34(12):811–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00391.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Buzzi M, de Freitas F, Winter M. A prospective descriptive study to assess the clinical benefits of using Calendula officinalis Hydroglycolic extract for the topical treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016;62(3):8–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Schneider F, Danski MT, Vayego SA. Usage of Calendula officinalis in the prevention and treatment of radiodermatitis: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49(2):221–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000200006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pommier P, Gomez F, Sunyach MP, D'Hombres A, Carrie C, Montbarbon X. Phase III randomized trial of Calendula officinalis compared with trolamine for the prevention of acute dermatitis during irradiation for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(8):1447–53. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.07.063.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Omidian M, Hemmati AA, Farajzade H, Houshmand G, Sattari A, Kouchak M. Priority of 5% quince seed cream versus 1% phenytoin cream in the healing of skin ulcers: a randomized controlled trial. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2015;10:e24590. https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-24590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Abbasi S, Kamalinejad M, Babaie D, Shams S, Sadr Z, Gheysari M, et al. A new topical treatment of atopic dermatitis in pediatric patients based on Ficus carica L. (fig): a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Complement Ther Med. 2017;35:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2017.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Javidnia K, Dastgheib L, Samani SM, Nasiri A. Antihirsutism activity of fennel (fruits of Foeniculum vulgare) extract. A double-blind placebo controlled study. Phytomedicine. 2003;10(6-7):455–8. https://doi.org/10.1078/094471103322331386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Akha O, Rabiei K, Kashi Z, Bahar A, Khorasani EZ, Kosaryan M, et al. The effect of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) gel 3% in decreasing hair thickness in idiopathic mild to moderate hirsutism, a randomized placebo controlled clinical trial. Caspian J Intern Med. 2014;5(1):26–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Schempp CM, Windeck T, Hezel S, Simon JC. Topical treatment of atopic dermatitis with St. John’s wort cream – a randomized, placebo controlled, double blind half-side comparison. Phytomedicine. 2003;10:31–7. https://doi.org/10.1078/1433-187X-00306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hajhashemi M, Ghanbari Z, Movahedi M, Rafieian M, Keivani A, Haghollahi F. The effect of Achillea millefolium and Hypericum perforatum ointments on episiotomy wound healing in primiparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(1):63–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1275549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lavagna SM, Secci D, Chimenti P, Bonsignore L, Ottaviani A, Bizzari B. Efficacy of Hypericum and Calendula oils in the epithelial reconstruction of surgical wounds in childbirth with caesarean section. Farmaco. 2001;56(5-7):451–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-827X(01)01060-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Najafizadeh P, Hashemian F, Mansouri P, Farshi S, Surmaghi MS, Chalangari R. The evaluation of the clinical effect of topical St Johns wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) in plaque type psoriasis vulgaris: a pilot study. Australas J Dermatol. 2012;53(2):131–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-0960.2012.00877.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Samadi S, Khadivzadeh T, Emami A, Moosavi NS, Tafaghodi M, Behnam HR. The effect of Hypericum perforatum on the wound healing and scar of cesarean. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(1):113–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2009.0317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Vakilian K, Atarha M, Bekhradi R, Chaman R. Healing advantages of lavender essential oil during episiotomy recovery: a clinical trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2011;17(1):50–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2010.05.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Koytchev R, Alken RG, Dundarov S. Balm mint extract (Lo-701) for topical treatment of recurring herpes labialis. Phytomedicine. 1999;6(4):225–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0944-7113(99)80013-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kim KY, Jang HH, Lee SN, Kim YS, An S. Effects of the myrtle essential oil on the acne skin—clinical trials for Korean women. Biomed Dermatol. 2018;2(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41702-018-0038-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Nasiri M, Fayazi S, Jahani S, Yazdanpanah L, Haghighizadeh MH. The effect of topical olive oil on the healing of foot ulcer in patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind randomized clinical trial study in Iran. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015;14(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40200-015-0167-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Danby SG, AlEnezi T, Sultan A, Lavender T, Chittock J, Brown K, et al. Effect of olive and sunflower seed oil on the adult skin barrier: implications for neonatal skin care. Pediatr Dermatol. 2013;30(1):42–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1470.2012.01865.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Tastekin D, Tambas M, Kilic K, Erturk K, Arslan D. The efficacy of Pistacia Terebinthus soap in the treatment of cetuximab-induced skin toxicity. Investig New Drugs. 2014;32(6):1295–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0128-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Fuchs SM, Schliemann-Willers S, Fischer TW, Elsner P. Protective effects of different marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) and rosemary cream preparations against sodium-lauryl-sulfate-induced irritant contact dermatitis. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2005;18:195–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Teker AM, Korkut AY, Kahya V, Gedikli O. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of Ankaferd blood stopper in patients with acute anterior epistaxis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267(9):1377–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1208-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Teker AM, Korkut AY, Gedikli O, Kahya V. Prospective, controlled clinical trial of Ankaferd blood stopper in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73(12):1742–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Gorgulu S, Norgaz T, Sipahi I. Ankaferd blood stopper as a new strategy to avoid early complications after transradial procedures: a randomized clinical trial. J Interv Cardiol. 2018;31(4):511–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Concato J. Observational versus experimental studies: what’s the evidence for a hierarchy? NeuroRx. 2004;1(3):341–7. https://doi.org/10.1602/neurorx.1.3.341.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med. 2016;21(4):125–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Jabbari M, Daneshfard B, Emtiazy M, Khiveh A, Hashempur MH. Biological effects and clinical applications of dwarf elder (Sambucus ebulus L): a review. J Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2017;22(4):996–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587217701322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hosseinkhani A, Falahatzadeh M, Raoofi E, Zarshenas MM. An evidence-based review on wound healing herbal remedies from reports of traditional Persian medicine. J Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2017;22(2):334–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587216654773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Pereira RF, Bártolo PJ. Traditional therapies for skin wound healing. Adv Wound Care. 2016;5(5):208–29. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2013.0506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Shedoeva A, Leavesley D, Upton Z, Fan C. Wound healing and the use of medicinal plants. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019;2684108:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2684108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Authors EA, AYU, MSE designed the study; ZA, AYB, HO collected literature and typed the manuscript. EA supervised and collected literature. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zinar Alan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alan, Z., Özgüldü, H., Erdal, M.S. et al. Evaluation of clinical trials of the plants, which have ethnobotanical uses for skin disorders in Turkey: a review. Clin Phytosci 7, 79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40816-021-00316-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ethnobotany
  • Skin diseases
  • Clinical trials
  • Medicinal plants