Skip to content

Advertisement

International Journal of Phytomedicine and Phytotherapy

Clinical Phytoscience Cover Image
  • Original contribution
  • Open Access

Pharmacological activities of leaf and bark extracts of a medicinal mangrove plant Avicennia officinalis L.

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 2Email author
Clinical PhytoscienceInternational Journal of Phytomedicine and Phytotherapy20184:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40816-018-0072-0

  • Received: 16 January 2018
  • Accepted: 16 March 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Avicennia officinalis is a medicinally important mangrove plant and used in traditional medicinal practices to treat various ailments like rheumatism, paralysis, asthma, dyspepsia, tumors etc. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the carbohydrate metabolizing enzyme inhibitory, antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic potentials of ethanol leaf and bark extracts of A. officinalis.

Methods

The carbohydrate metabolizing enzyme inhibition potential was studied by α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities. The antioxidant activity was investigated by measuring the scavenging potential of extracts against DPPH, ABTS and superoxide radicals. The antimicrobial activity was studied by agar well diffusion method and the cytotoxicity potential by MTT assay.

Results

The study revealed that A.offiicnalis bark extract inhibited the activity of α-amylase and α-glucosidase in a dose dependent manner with an IC50 value of 0.66 and 0.71 mg/ml respectively. The leaf extract also demonstrated inhibition potential against α-amylase and α-glucosidase with an IC50 value of 0.29 and 1.19 mg/ml respectively. The ethanol bark extract also exhibited scavenging potential against DPPH, ABTS and superoxide radicals in a dose dependent manner with IC50 values of 112, 114 and 82 μg/ml respectively and ethanol leaf extract with IC50 values of 200, 41.9 and 207.6 μg/ml respectively. Both leaf and bark extracts exhibited dose dependent antiproferative activity on TC1 murine cell lines. Both leaf and bark extracts exhibited antimicrobial activity against bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fungi (Candida albicans, C. krusei). The qualitative phytochemical assay, UV-Vis and FTIR analysis revealed the presence of different phytoconstituents in the leaf and bark extracts of A.officinalis.

Conclusion

The results suggest that ethanol leaf and bark extracts of A.officinalis were effective in inhibiting α-amylase and α-glucosidase and also have antioxidant, antimicrobial potentials which justify the ethnobotanical use of this plant.

Keywords

  • Avicennia officinalis
  • Antidiabetic
  • Antioxidant
  • Antimicrobial
  • Cytotoxic

Background

The plant Avicennia officinalis L. belonging to family Acanthaceae is one of the important mangrove species [1]. A. officinalis L., is an evergreen mangrove plant usually growing 8 - 18 m tall and 1 m in diameter and widely distributed in Indian subcontinent, Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Viet Nam, and southern Papua New Guinea. This mangrove species is widely distributed across the coastal region of Indian coasts and Andaman Nicobar islands [2, 3].

Wide uses of different parts of A. officinalis in traditional medicinal practices have been well documented. Seeds of this plant are used as maturative poultices and ulcers and to hasten suppuration of boils and abscesses. Roots are used as aphrodisiac, bark as diuretic, in the management of skin afflictions especially scabies, rheumatism, paralysis, asthma and snake-bites. Fruits are used as plaster for tumors [4, 5]. Plant decoction with sugar and cumin is used in dealing with dyspepsia. A resinous substance exuded from the bark acts as a contraceptive [6]. Different studies have also reported the pharmacological importance of this plant. The leaf, bark roots and fruits of this plant showed antimicrobial activities [712]. The leaves of this plant exhibited antiulcer [12], antinociceptive [13], anti-inflammatory [14]; anticancer [15] and antioxidant [16] activities.

In the present study, the ethanol bark and leaf extracts of A.officinalis plant were evaluated for their in inhibitory effects against carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes such as α-amylase and α-glucosidase, as well as their antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic potentials.

Methods

Collection of plant and extraction

Leaves and stem barks of Avicennia officinalis were collected from the mangrove forest of Mahanadi delta region of Odisha coast. The plant specimen was identified by Prasanna Kumar Nayak, Herbarium keeper, Integrated Coastal Zone Management Project (ICZMP), Forest Department, Govt. of Odisha. After collection, the plant samples were air dried under shade at room temperature and grounded. The samples were extracted by maceration using 90% ethanol. The obtained crude extracts were evaporated to dryness. Then the extracts were dissolved in DMSO for further studies.

Phytochemical analysis

Qualitative and quantitative phytochemical analysis

Different phytochemicals are determined qualitatively. Total phenol, flavonoid and tannin content of leaf and bark extracts of A. officinalis were determined quantitatively using standardized phytochemical assay methods [17].

UV-Vis spectral analysis

The leaf extracts of A. officinalis were scanned in the wavelength range between 240 and 700 nm by using Systronics UV-VIS spectrophotometer 117 and the peaks thus recorded were evaluated for presence of phenolic compounds.

FT-IR study

FT-IR analysis was performed using FT-IR spectrometer (PerkinElmer FT-IR Spectrometer- Spectrum Two) to detect the characteristic peaks and their corresponding functional groups. The scans were made in a wave number range from 4000 and 400 cm− 1.

Pharmacological study

In vitro carbohydrate metabolizing enzyme inhibition assay

α-Amylase inhibition assay

The in vitro antidiabetic activity of the leaf and bark samples of A. officinalis were evaluated employing the α-amylase enzyme inhibition assay [18]. The experiments were performed by taking plant extracts at 0.1, 0.5 and 1 mg/ml concentrations. The porcine α-amylase was dissolved in cold 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.7 containing 6.7 mM of NaCl. The enzyme and extracts at different concentrations were mixed and pre-incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. After incubation 0.5% starch as substrate (dissolved in 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.7) was transferred to the pre-incubated mixture and further incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. After incubation, DNS colour reagent was added to each reaction mixture and reaction mixture was placed in boiling water bath for 10 min. Thereafter, after cooling the absorbance of the mixture was taken at 540 nm. Acarbose was used as positive control. All the experiments were performed in triplicate. The IC50 values were determined.

α–Glucosidase inhibition assay

The α-glucosidase enzyme inhibition activity was evaluated following the method of Apostolidis, et al. [19] with some modifications. Briefly, α -Glucosidase (1 U/mL) was premixed with 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg of extract in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) at pH 6.8. Then the reaction mixture was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C. After the incubation, 1 mmol/L of paranitrophenyl alpha D glucopyranoside in 50 mmol/L of phosphate buffer was added to initiate the reaction. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 1 mol/L sodium carbonate. α -Glucosidase activity of the mixture was determined by measuring the quantity of nitrophenol released from pNPG. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 405 nm. Acarbose was used as positive control. The results were expressed in concentration of extract required to inhibit 50% of α -glucosidase (IC50).

In vitro antioxidant assay

DPPH radical scavenging assay

The DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) scavenging properties of ethanol bark and leaf extracts of A. officinalis were evaluated employing the method of Povichit et al. [20]. Briefly, the leaf and bark samples of different concentrations (50 μg/ml to150 μg/ml) were mixed with 0.1 mM DPPH solution and incubated for 30 min at room temperature under dark condition. The scavenging potential was estimated by taking absorbance at 517 nm. BHT was used as positive control under the same condition. The percentage of DPPH scavenging was calculated as:
$$ \%\mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{DPPH}\ \mathrm{scavenging}=\frac{{\mathrm{Abs}}_{\mathrm{Control}}-{\mathrm{Abs}}_{\mathrm{Sample}}}{{\mathrm{Abs}}_{\mathrm{Control}}}\times 100 $$

Where, Abs Control is the absorbance of the control reaction, and Abs Sample is the absorbance of the test sample.

ABTS radical scavenging assay

The ABTS scavenging activity was measured following the method of Hsu et al. [21], with modifications. ABTS+ solution was prepared by mixing 7 mM of ABTS and 2.45 mM of K2S2O8 in water, which was incubated for 12 h in dark at room temperature. Before use, the ABTS solution was diluted with ethanol to get an absorbance of 0.7 ± 0.02 at 734 nm by using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Systronics). Briefly, 2 mL of the ABTS solutionwas added to test samples at different concentrations (50, 100, 150 μg/ml). The samples were mixed thoroughly, the reaction mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 10 min, and the absorbance was recorded immediately at 734 nm. The % of ABTS scavenging activity was calculated as:
$$ \%\mathrm{of}\kern0.5em \mathrm{ABTS}\ \mathrm{scavenging}\ \mathrm{activity}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \frac{{\mathrm{Abs}}_{\mathrm{Control}}-{\mathrm{Abs}}_{\mathrm{Sample}}}{{\mathrm{Abs}}_{\mathrm{Control}}}\times 100 $$

Where, Abs Control is the absorbance of the control reaction, and Abs Sample is the absorbance of the test sample.

Superoxide scavenging assay

The super oxide scavenging properties of ethanol bark and leaf extracts of A. officinalis were evaluated employing the method of Kono [22]. Briefly, the reaction mixture contains EDTA (0.1 mM), NBT (24 mM), sodium bicarbonate (50 mM, pH 10.2). The reaction was initiated by the addition of 400 μl hydroxylamine hydrochloride, followed by various concentrations (50, 100 and 150 μg) of the samples and were incubated at 25 °C for 15 min. The % of scavenging of superoxide radical was evaluated by recording the rate of NBT reduction at an absorbance of 560 nm. The percentage inhibition of NBT reduction was calculated as below:
$$ \%\mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{Superoxide}\ \mathrm{scavenging}\ \mathrm{activity}=\frac{\mathrm{Change}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{absorbance}\ \mathrm{per}{\min}_{\mathrm{Control}}-\mathrm{Change}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{absorbance}\ \mathrm{per}{\min}_{\mathrm{Sample}}}{\mathrm{Change}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{absorbance}\ \mathrm{per}{\min}_{\mathrm{Control}}}\times 100 $$

Where, Acontrol is the absorbance of the control reaction and Asample is the absorbance of the sample.

Cytotoxicity assay

Maintenance of Cancer cell line

The TC1 murine cancer cell line obtained from National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India and maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fatal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic solution. The culture conditions were 37 °C, 5% CO2. The cells were harvested after attainment of 75-80% confluence using trypsin (0.025%) and EDTA (0.52 mM) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS).

Assessment of cell morphology

The TC1 murine cells were grown in 96-well plates with 104 cells per well. DNA fragmentation or chromatin condensation of the cells were detected by 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining followed by observation of cells under fluorescence microscope. The apoptotic cells and necrotic cells were differentiated from live cells by staining the cells with acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EtBr).

Determination of cytotoxicity by MTT assay

The effect of bark and leaf extracts of A. officinalis on the viability of TC1 murine cell line was investigated by MTT assay. About 104 cells per well in triplicate were seeded in a 96-well culture plate followed by treatment with A. officinalis extracts at different concentrations for 72 h. Then to each well, 20 μl of MTT (5 mg/ml) solution were added and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. The viability of the cells was observed by taking the absorbance at 595 nm.

Antimicrobial study

The bacterial strains of Bacillus subtilis (MTCC736), Escherichia coli (MTCC443), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC424), Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC737) and fungal strains viz. Candida albicans (MTCC227), Candida krusei (MTCC9215) were obtained from Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh and the cultures were maintained as per the MTCC instructions. The antimicrobial activity of ethanol bark and leaf extracts of A.officinalis were assessed by agar well diffusion method against the different bacterial and fungal strains as mentioned above. Overnight broth culture of the bacterial isolates and fungal isolates were seeded over the nutrient agar and potato dextrose agar plates respectively using sterile cotton swab to make lawn culture. Wells of 5 mm diameter were punched over the agar plates using sterile gel puncher and 5 μl (20 mg/ml dissolved in DMSO) of each extract was poured into each well. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in case of bacteria and 48 h at 28 °C hr in case of fungal strains. The clear zones formed around each well were measured and average diameter of the inhibition zone was expressed in mm. Tetracycline (10 μg/disc) was used as positive control. DMSO served as negative control. Each experiment was carried out in triplicates. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of the ethanol leaf and bark extracts as well as the positive control Tetracycline were determined using a microdilution method [23].

Statistical analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate and the data obtained were expressed as mean ± standard error mean (SEM). The concentration giving 50% inhibition (IC50) was calculated by non-linear regression analysis.

Results and discussion

Phytochemical analysis

Mangrove plants contain biologically active phytochemicals such as steroids, terpenoids, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, and phenols that are responsible for their bioactivities including their blood glucose lowering effects, antioxidant, anticancer and antimicrobial properties [24]. In the present study, the preliminary phytochemical analysis were undertaken for the ethanol leaf (EL) and ethanol bark (EB) extracts of A. officinalis to ascertain different phytochemicals responsible for its different bioactivities. The qualitative phytochemical screening in A.officinalis revealed the presence steroids, flavonoids, tannins and phenolics both in the ethanol bark and leaf extracts. However, presence of saponins and terpenoids were only reported in ethanol bark extracts (Table 1). The quantitative analysis of EB and EL of A.officinalis for total phenol content, total flavonoid content and total tannin content was carried out and reported in Table 2. Total phenol content (TPC) in the ethanol bark and leaf extracts of A.officinalis were evaluated by plotting a standard curve using different concentrations of GAE (Gallic acid equivalent) with their respective absorbance at 700 nm. The total amount of phenolic contents present in each extract was evaluated by using the calibration curve which was expressed as mg of GAE/g. The EB extract exhibited higher amount of phenol content (48.22 mg/g GAE) as compared to EL extract (29.84 mg/g GAE). The EB also showed higher flavonoid content (0.051 mg/g QE) as compared to EL extract (0.012 mg/g QE). The tannin content in the ethanol bark of A.officinalis was recorded as 36 mg/g GAE which was much higher than the ethanol leaf extract having 9.61 mg/g GAE.
Table 1

Preliminary phytochemical screening of A. officinalis extracts

Sample

Steroids

Saponins

Phenols

Terpenoids

Flavonoids

Tannins

EB

+

+

+

+

+

+

EL

+

+

+

+

(+) = present () = absent

Table 2

Total phenol, flavonoids and tannins contents of A. officinalis extracts

Sample

Polyphenolic content

(mg/g of GAE)

Flavonoids content

(mg/g of QAE)

Condensed tannins content

(mg/g of GAE)

EB

48.22 ± 0.51

0.051 ± 0.002

36 ± 1.11

EL

29.84 ± 1.2

0.012 ± 0.002

9.61 ± 0.15

UV-visible and FT-IR analysis provide reliable and sensitive method for detection of bio molecular composition of plant species. Therefore in the present study UV-visible and FT-IR techniques are employed to evaluate the UV visible and IR finger print in ethanol solvent extracts of EL and EB of A. officinalis. The UV-VIS spectroscopy offers a simple, technique to identify the main phytochemicals. The qualitative UV-Visible spectrum profile of A. officinalis, ethanol extract was selected from 200 to 700 nm due to sharpness of peaks and proper baseline. The profile showed the peak at 270 nm for ethanol bark (Fig. 1a) and ethanol leaf (Fig. 1b) extracts confirming the presence of phenolic derivatives in the extract of A. officinalis. The FTIR analysis is one of the most commonly used analytical technique used to identify the functional groups of any plant extracts. The functional groups are identified depending on their corresponding peak values in the infra red (IR) spectral region. The FTIR spectrum of ethanol leaf and bark extracts of A. officinalis were given in Fig. 2a and b. The ethanol leaf extract exhibited characteristic bands at 721, 1053, 1239, 1338, 1401, 1630, 1728, 2944 and 3516 cm− 1 for -C-O-H, C-O-C, -CH3, C=C, -C=O, -C-H, N-H groups. Similarly, the EB extract showed bands at 539, 655, 884, 1040, 1233, 1323, 1377, 1512, 1697, 2867, 2941 and 3455 cm− 1 (Table 3). Earlier studies have also shown that different solvent extracts from leaf, bark and fruit extracts of A. officinalis were rich in alkaloids, glycosides, terpenoids, flavonoids, steroids, tannins, saponins, phenols etc. [3, 25]. Taking these results into account, the antioxidant, antidiabetic, cytotoxic and antimicrobial potential of the ethanol leaf and bark extracts of A. officinalis attributed to the presence of different phytoconstituents of leaf and bark extracts of A.officinalis.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

UV-Vis spectra of A. officinalis ethanol bark (1a) and leaf (1b) extracts

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

FT-IR spectra of A. officinalis ethanol bark (2a) and leaf (2b) extracts

Table 3

FTIR spectral peak values and functional groups obtained for ethanol leaf and bark extracts of A. officinalis

Wave number (cm− 1)

Assigned functional group

539

torsion and ring torsion of phenyl

600-900

-CH out of plane bending vibrations

1053

C-OH

1233, 1239, 1323, 1338, 1377

C-O stretching vibrations

1401

–OH bending vibrations

1630

=C–H stretching vibrations

1697, 1728

–C=O stretching vibrations

2867, 2941, 2944

Asymmetric –CH2–, symmetric –CH3 and –CH2– stretching vibrations

3455, 3516

Stretching vibration of bonded and non-bonded –O–H groups

Carbohydrate metabolizing enzyme inhibition study

Amongst various therapeutic approaches for treating diabetes, decrease in the postprandial hyperglycemia is the major one. This condition can be achieved by retarding the absorption of glucose through the inhibition of carbohydrate hydrolysing enzymes (α-amylase and α-glucosidase) in the digestive tract. Presences of inhibitors of these enzymes delays and prolong carbohydrate digestion time. The effect causes a reduction in the rate of glucose absorption and consequently blunts the postprandial plasma glucose rise [26]. The antidiabetic potential of ethanol bark and leaf extracts of A. officinalis were evaluated by α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition assays. In the present study the carbohydrate metabolizing enzyme inhibition potentials were evaluated at 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg concentrations since below 0.1 mg concentration the inhibition capacities were non-significant (data not shown). The study revealed that both ethanol bark and leaf extracts of A. officinalis were able to inhibit both α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes in a dose dependent manner except for α-glucosidase inhibition activity of EL. An increase in the α-amylase inhibition was observed with increase in concentration of extracts. The EL showed better potential to inhibit α-amylase enzyme with an IC50 value of 0.29 mg/ml as compared to EB with IC50 value of 0.66 mg/ml. The standard drug Acarbose exhibited better α-amylase inhibition potential with IC50 value of 0.15 mg/ml. However, the EB showed better potential than EL extracts in inhibiting α-glucosidase enzymes. The IC50 values for EB and EL were observed as 0.71 and 1.19 mg/ml respectively in reference to standard drug Acarbose having IC50 value of 0.11 mg/ml towards their capacities to inhibit α-glucosidase enzymes (Tables 4 and 5). The carbohydrate metabolism enzyme inhibition potentials of plants are associated with presence phytochemicals like phenol and their polyphenolic derivatives like flavonoids, tannins [27]. Hence, the presence of phenolics, flavonoids, and tannins in A. officinalis leaf and bark extracts would have been contributed toward α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition.
Table 4

Antidiabetic activities of ethanol leaf and bark extracts of A. officinalis

Sample

Concentration

(mg/ml)

α-Amylase inhibition

α-Glucosidase inhibition

% of inhibition

IC50(mg/ml)

% of inhibition

IC50(mg/ml)

EB

0.1

31.0 ± 2.71

0.66

25.24 ± 1.09

0.71

0.5

48.14 ± 3

41.34 ± 1.09

1.0

63.57 ± 7

64.02 ± 2.07

EL

0.1

68.2 ± 0.01

0.29

31.8 ± 0.01

1.19

0.5

75 ± 0.01

36.6

1.0

81.7 ± 0.01

39.9 ± 0.01

Acarbose

  

0.15

 

0.11

Table 5

Radical scavenging potentials of ethanol leaf and bark extracts of A. officinalis

Sample

Concentration

(μg/ml)

DPPH scavenging

ABTS scavenging

Superoxide scavenging

% of

scavenging

IC50

(μg/ml)

% of scavenging

IC50

(μg/ml)

% of

scavenging

IC50

(μg/ml)

EB

50

26.94 ± 2.22

112

35.89 ± 2.13

114

34.55 ± 0.47

82

100

49.81 ± 1.25

49.33 ± 1.15

64.02 ± 1.49

150

61.75 ± 2.08

56.96 ± 1.63

85.6 ± 0.95

EL

50

25.1 ± 0.42

200

88.91 ± 0.34

41.9

8.88 ± 0.0.74

207.6

100

29.36 ± 2.05

92.49 ± 0.34

15.16 ± 1.04

150

33.69 ± 2.52

93.94 ± 0.68

40.47 ± 0.96

Standard

  

47.5

 

76.5

 

83

Antioxidant activity

Oxidative injury now appears the fundamental mechanism underlying a number of human disorders such as inflammation, viral infections, autoimmune pathologies, diabetes, cancer etc [28]. So it is quite possible that antioxidants of natural origin can play a pivotal role in management of oxidative stress mediated complications. The antioxidant potential of plant extracts can be evaluated by various in vitro and in vivo antioxidant methods. In the present study, the antioxidant activities of the EB and EL extracts of A.officinalis were evaluated at 50, 100 and 150 μg/ml concentrations by employing DPPH, ABTS and superoxide scavenging assays Table 5.

DPPH antioxidant activity test is a direct and dependable method for determining the radical scavenging action. An odd electron from the DPPH radical is responsible for the absorbance at 517 nm and also for a noticeable deep purple colour. When DPPH accepts an electron from an antioxidant compound, the DPPH becomes colourless, which can be quantitatively measured from the changes in absorbance. The present study showed that both EB and EL extracts of A. officinalis could scaveng DPPH radical. The EB extract scavenging potential varied between 26.94 to 61.75% with IC50 value of 112 μg/ml. The EL potential for scavenging DPPH radical varied between 25.1 to 33.69% at the different concentrations in the present study with IC50 value of 200 μg/ml. BHT under the similar condition could scavenge DPPH radical with IC50 value of 47.5 μg/ml. The results were in line with the previous study by [29], and showed 34.9% scavenging activity at highest concentration (150 μg/ml) of the extract.

The ABTS assay is based on the inhibition of the absorbance of radical cation, ABTS+ by antioxidants. The principle behind the assay involves the reaction between ABTS and potassium per sulphate to produce the ABTS radical cation (ABTS+) which is a blue green chromogen. In the presence of antioxidants the coloured radical is converted back to colourless ABTS [30]. The present study revealed that both EB and EL extracts of A. officinalis could scavenge ABTS radical. However, EL exhibited better ABTS radical scavenging activity as compare to EL with IC50 value of 41.9 μg/ml which was even better than the ABTS scavenging potential of BHT with IC50 value of 76.5 μg/ml. The EB extract demonstrated ABTS radical scavenging activity with IC50 value of 114 μg/ml.

Superoxide radical is known to be very harmful to cellular components and acts as a precursor of the more reactive oxygen species. It contributes to tissue damage and various diseases [31]. In superoxide radical scavenging assay, superoxide derived from hydroxylamine hydrochloride reduces NBT to a chromogenic complex formazan. Colour reduction indicated the consumption of superoxide anion by antioxidants. The present study showed that both EB and EL extracts of A. officinalis have moderate to better superoxide anion scavenging potential. The EL extracts showed better superoxide scavenging potential with IC50 value of 82 μg/ml. In the similar condition the standard antioxidant compound ascorbic acid could scavenge superoxide anion with IC50 value of 83 μg/ml. Phenolic compounds account for the most antioxidant activities of plant extracts [32]. Our results observed high content of polyphenolic compound and flavonoids in EB and EL extracts of A.officinalis which might have contributed for the acclaimed antioxidant activities of A.officinalis.

Cytotoxicity activity

The MTT is a non-radioactive, colorimetric quantification assay that assesses the cell proliferation and viability and cytotoxicity. The assay is based in the enzymatic cleavage of the tetrazolium salt to insoluble purple formazan by cellular mitochondrial dehydrogenases present in viable cells [33]. In order to investigate the cytotoxic effects of A.officinalis ethanol leaf and bark extracts, murine TC1 cell lines were adopted in the present study. The MTT assay is a commonly used for measurement of cell proliferation and viability against different factors such as cytokines, mitogens and nutrients. This is also useful for analysis of different cytotoxic and cytostatic compounds, such as anticancer drugs, pharmaceutical compounds and different phytochemicals as well. The ethanol leaf and bark extracts of A. officinalis at different doses (1, 2.5 and 5 mg/ml) were incubated with TC1 cells and the cell viability was determined at 24, 48 and 72 h intervals. Results of this assay indicated that the ethanol leaf and bark extracts of A.officinalis exhibited cytotoxicity in a concentration dependent manner (Fig. 3a and b). Both EB and EL extracts of A.officinalis showed significant effect on TC1 cell in concentration range between 5 mg/ml to 1 mg/ml as compared with control. The highest cytotoxicity of EB and EL extracts against TC1 cell were found in 5 mg/ml concentration with 82.45 and 80.49% of cell growth inhibition. The EB and EL extracts showed prominent cytotoxic activities at all the three concentrations i.e. 1, 2.5 and 5 mg/ml after 24 h of incubation with IC50 values of 3 and 3.91 mg/ml. At 48 h, the EB and EL extracts exhibited cytotoxic activity on TC1 cells with IC50 values of 2.9 and 3.27 mg/ml. After incubation with TC1 cell line for 72 h, both EB and EL exhibited prominent cytotoxic activities with IC50 value of 2.4 and 2.8 mg/ml (Table 6). The morphological changes in TC1 murine cells were observed after 48 h with EB and EL extracts of A.officinalis. TC1 murine cells upon staining with DAPI and AO/EtBr dye revealed apoptotic changes like condensed and fragmented nuclei in both EB and EL treated TC1 cells after 48 h treatment (Figure 4). The microscopic study indicated death of TC1 cells induced by both EB and EL probably due to apoptosis. These results can be attributed to the presence of bioactive phytoconstituents present in the ethanol bark and leaf extracts of A.officinalis. Previous studies have also highlighted the anticancer properties of A. officinalis [15, 34, 35]. The present study clearly demonstrated the cytotoxicity properties of A. officinalis which was in line with the previous study carried out by Reddy and Ratna (2016) [35]. As per the US National Cancer Institute plant screening program, a crude extract considered effective for in vitro cytotoxic activity if the IC50 is less than 20 μg/ml following incubation between 48 and 72 h in carcinoma cells [36]. However, the present study demonstrated that both EB and EL extracts exhibited cytotoxic activities against TC1 cell line after 72 h of incubation with IC50 value > 1 mg/ml 12.4 and 2.8 mg/ml for 72 h; hence, may not be considered promising. The result in the present study is not in line with earlier studies which may be due to the difference in the extracts or cell line.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Viability were measured by MTT assay using different concentrations (0,1,2.5,5 mg/ml) of A.officinalis bark (3a) and leaf (3b) for 24, 48 and 72 h . All the experiments were done in triplicate and data are represented as mean ± SEM from triplicate independent experiments

Table 6

Cytotoxic activities of ethanol leaf and extracts of A. officinalis

Extracts

IC50 values (mg/ml)

24 h

48 h

72 h

EB

3.0 ± 0.04

2.9 ± 0.01

2.4 ± 0.13

EL

3.91 ± 0.33

3.27 ± 0.16

2.8 ± 0.10

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Growth inhibitory effect of ethanol bark and leaf extracts of A. officinalis on TC1 cell line (A) Morphological and nuclear changes in TC1 cells after addition of 3 mg/ml for 48 h. Upper row: Morphological changes seen under light microscope. Middle and lower row: Nuclear changes seen under fluorescence microscope after DAPI and A.O./Et.Br staining respectively

Antimicrobial activity

The antimicrobial activities of EB and EL extracts of A.officinalis are shown in Table 7. Antimicrobial study in the present study revealed that both ethanol leaves and barks of A.officinalis were able to inhibit the growth of bacterial and fungal strains to different extent. The EB and EL extracts exhibited antimicrobial activity on both bacterial and fungal strains studied and inhibition zone diameters were 14.5-25.5 mm. The EB and EL extracts exhibited better antibacterial effect against P. auruginosa (MIC value as 100 μg/ml) as compared to B. subtilis, E.coli and S.aureus strains (MIC value as 200 μg/ml). Further, EL exhibited no antibacterial effect against S.aureus (Table 7). The MIC values for fungal microbe C. albicans and C.krushi were 100 μg/ml each for EB extracts and 200 and 100 μg/ml respectively for EL extracts. It has been reported that crude plant extracts of plants having MIC values < 100 μg/mL are considered potentially useful for antimicrobial study; therefore, the present study demonstrated the use of the leaf and bark extracts of A.officinalis for development of lead compounds for antimicrobial therapeutics. Results of the present findings also corroborates with previous published reports [8, 9, 12]. The antimicrobial activity may be attributed to the presence of different polyphenolic compounds in the A.officinalis leaf and bark extracts. The results of the antimicrobial study indicated that that this plant has a scientific basis in traditional use and can be further investigated as antibacterial source.
Table 7

Antimicrobial activities of ethanol leaf and extracts of A. officinalis

Microorganisms

EB

EL

Tetracycline

Zone of inhibition

(in mm)

MIC (μg/ml)

Zone of inhibition

(in mm)

MIC (μg/ml)

Zone of inhibition

(in mm)

MIC (μg/ml)

B. subtilis

16.5 ± 0.5

200

20.5 ± 0.5

200

28.5 ± 0.5

25

E.coli

16.5 ± 0.5

200

15.2 ± 0.7

200

25.5 ± 0.5

50

P. aeruginosa

25.6 ± 0.7

100

22.8 ± 0.3

100

30.5 ± 0.5

25

S. aureus

14.5 ± 0.5

200

25.5 ± 0.5

50

C.albicans

25.5 ± 0.5

100

23.8 ± 0.7

200

30.5 ± 0.5

25

C. krushi

25.5 ± 0.5

100

25 ± 0.5

100

31.8 ± 0.7

25

Conclusion

The present study highlights the possible use of bark and leaf extracts of A. officinalis as source of antioxidant, antimicrobial agents. The study showed that both leaf and bark extracts could inhibit carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes (α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase). The study also demonstrated that both leaf and bark extracts contain considerable quantity of phenols, flavonoids and tannins that were found to be major contributor for their antioxidant, antmicrobial and carbohydrate metabolizing enzyme inhibitory activities. However, the present study demonstrated that the cytotoxicity potential of the extracts were not promising. In conclusion, these preliminary in vitro results are encouraging for further biological and phytochemical studies aimed at isolating and identifying the active principles, which could provide scientific evidence for the use of bark and leaf extracts of A. officinalis for therapeutic purpose.

Abbreviations

A.O.: 

Acridine Orange

ABTS: 

2,2′-Azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid

DMEM

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium

DPPH: 

2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl

EtBr: 

/Ethidium Bromide

MTT: 

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to PCCF (Wildlife), Govt. of Odisha, for giving the necessary permission for the research work. The authors are also thankful to the DFO, Rajnagar, Odisha and their field staff for their kind help and cooperation during the field study.

Funding

No funding.

Authors’ contributions

HNT has edited the manuscript. SKD, DS and AM have conducted all the experiments. RM and NP conducted the cytotoxicity study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biotechnology, College of Engineering and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751029, India
(2)
Department of Biotechnology, North Orissa University, Baripada, Odisha, India

References

  1. The Plant List (2013). Version 1.1. Published on the Internet; http://www.theplantlist.org. Accessed 1 Jan 2013.
  2. Tomlinson PB. The botany of mangroves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  3. Thatoi H, Das SK, Samantaray D. The genus Avicennia, a pioneer group of dominant mangrove plant species with potential medicinal values: a review. Front Life Sci. 2016;9:267–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kirtikar KR, Basu BB. Indian medicinal plants. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jayyed Press; 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Duke JA, Wain KK. Medicinal plants of the world. Computer index with more than 85,000 entries; 1981. p. 1654.Google Scholar
  6. Perry LM. Medicinal plants of east and Southeast Asia. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1980.Google Scholar
  7. Bakshi M, Chaudhuri P. Antimicrobial potential of leaf extracts of ten mangrove species from Indian Sundarban. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2014;5:294–304.Google Scholar
  8. Valentin BB, Meenupriya J, Elsa JL, Naveena DE, Kumar S, Thangaraj M. Antibacterial activity and characterization of secondary metabolites isolated from mangrove plant Avicennia ofcinalis. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2010;1:412–20.Google Scholar
  9. Shanmugapriya R, Ramanathan T, Renugadevi G. Phytochemical characterization and antimicrobial efficiency of mangrove plants Avicennia marina and Avicennia officinalis. Int J Pharm Biol Arch. 2012;3:348–51.Google Scholar
  10. Sharief MN, Umamaheswararao V. Antibacterial activity of stem and root extracts of Avicennia ofcinalis L. Int J Pharm App. 2011;2:231–6.Google Scholar
  11. Sharief MN, Srinivasulu A, Chittibabu B, Umamaheswararao V. Identifcation of bioactive principles of Avicennia ofcinalis fruit extract in methanol and screening for antibacterial activity. Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res. 2015;7:73–7.Google Scholar
  12. Khushi S, Hasan Md M, Al-Hossain ASMM, Hossain Md L, Sadhu SK. Medicinal activity of Avicennia officinalis: evaluation of phytochemical and pharmacological properties. Saudi J Med Pharm Sci. 2016;2:250–5.Google Scholar
  13. Shahid IZ, Ahmed F, Karmakar D, Sadhu SK. Antinociceptive activity of Avicennia officinalis. Orient Pharm Exp Med. 2007;7:100–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sumithra M, Janjanam VK, Kancharana VS. Influence of methanolic extract of Avicennia officinalis leaves on acute, subacute and chronic inflammatory models. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2011;3:763–8.Google Scholar
  15. Sumithra M, Anbu J, Nithya S, Ravichandiran V. Anticancer activity of methanolic leaves extract of Avicennia officinalis on ehrlich ascitis carcinoma cell lines in rodents. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2011;3:1290–2.Google Scholar
  16. Sharief MN, Umamaheswararao V. Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of Avicennia marina leaf. J Chem Pharm Res. 2014;6:B252–6.Google Scholar
  17. Harborne B. Phytochemical methods. London: Springer; 1998.Google Scholar
  18. Gella FJ, Gubern G, Vidal R, Canalias F. Determination of total and pancreatic α-amylase in human serum with 2-chloro-4-nitrophenyl-α-d-maltotrioside as substrate. Clin Chim Acta. 1997;259:147–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Apostolidis E, Kwon YI, Shetty K. Inhibitory potential of herb, fruit, and fungal-enriched cheese against key enzymes linked to type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2007;8:46–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Povichit N, Phrutivorapongkul A, Suttajit M, Chaiyasut C, Leelapornpisid P. Phenolic content and in vitro inhibitory effects on oxidation and protein glycation of some Thai medicinal plants. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2010;23:403–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsu CF, Peng H, Basle C, Sejdic JT, Kilmartin PA. ABTSþ scavenging activity of polypyrrole, polyaniline and poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Polym Int. 2011;60:69–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kono Y. Generation of superoxide radical during autoxidation of hydroxylamine and an assay for superoxide dismutase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1978;186:189–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dewanjee S, Kundu M, Maiti A, Majumdar R, Majumdar A, Mandal SC. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial activity of crude extract from plants Diospyros peregrina, Coccinia grandis and Swietenia macrophylla. Trop J Pharmacol Res. 2007;6:773–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bandaranayake WM. Bioactivities, bioactive compounds and chemical constituents of mangrove plants. Wet Eco Man. 2002;10:421–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kabir MSH, Hossain MM, Kabir MI, Rahman MM, Hasanat A, Emran TB, Rahman MA. Phytochemical screening, antioxidant, thrombolytic, α-amylase inhibition and cytotoxic activities of ethanol extract of Steudnera colocasiifolia K. Koch leaves. J Young Pharm. 2016;8:391–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ali H, Houghton PJ, Soumyanath A. α-amylase inhibitory activity of some Malaysian plants used to treat diabetes; with particular reference to Phyllanthus amarus. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;107:449–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mai TT, Thu NN, Tien PG, Van-Chuyen N. Alpha glucosidase inhibitory and antioxidant activities of Vietnamese edible plants and their relationships with polyphenol contents. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2007;53:267–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Aruoma OI. Methodological considerations for characterizing potential antioxidant actions of bioactive components in food plants. Mutat Res. 2003;523-524:9–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Thirunavukkarasu P, Ramanathan T, Ramkumar L, Shanmugapriya R, Renugadevi G. The antioxidant and radical scavenging effect of Avicennia officinalis. J Med Plants Res. 2011;5:4754–8.Google Scholar
  30. Sreejayan M, Rao MN. Free radical scavenging activity of curcuminoids. Arzneim Forsch. 1996;6:169–71.Google Scholar
  31. Hazra B, Biswas S, Mandal N. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of Spondias pinnata. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008;8:63–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Thatoi HN, Patra JK, Das SK. Free radical scavenging and antioxidant potential of mangrove plants: a review. Acta Physiol Plant. 2014;36:561–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Collier A, Pritsos C. The mitochondrial uncoupler dicumerol disrupts the MTT assay. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66:281–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Prakash O, Kumar A, Kumar PA. Anticancer potential of plants and natural products: a review. Am J Pharmacol Sci. 2013;1:104–15.Google Scholar
  35. Reddy A, Ratna GJ. Evaluation of in vitro anticancer activity of selected mangrove plant extracts against Mcf7 cell line. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2016;7:12315–8.Google Scholar
  36. Swaya TO, Aduma P, Chelimo K, Were O. Assessment of anti-proliferative activities of selected medicinal plant extracts used for Management of Diseases around Lake Victoria Basin. J Carcinog Mutagen. 2017;8:286.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement