Hepatoprotective studies on methanolic extract fractions of Lindernia ciliata and development of qualitative analytical profile for the bioactive extract

Background

The objective of the study is to evaluate the hepatoprotective activity of methanolic extract fractions of Lindernia ciliata (LC) and development of qualitative analytical profile of the bioactive fraction using HPLC fingerprinting analysis. All the fractions of methanolic extract of Lindernia ciliata (LCME) are assessed for their total phenolic, flavonoid contents and in vitro antioxidant properties by using DPPH, superoxide, nitric oxide, hydroxyl radical scavenging activities and reducing power assay. Acute toxicity study was conducted for all the fractions and the two test doses 50 and 100 mg/kg were selected for the hepatoprotective study. Liver damage was induced in different groups of rats by administering 3 g/kg.b.w.p.o. paracetamol and the effect of fractions were tested for hepatoprotective potential by evaluating serum biochemical parameters and histology of liver of rats. The effective fraction was evaluated for its antihepatotoxic activity against D-Galactosamine (400 mg/kg b.w. i.p.) and in vivo antioxidant parameters viz., Glutathione (GSH), Melondialdehyde (MDA) and Catalase (CAT) levels are estimated using liver homogenate.

Results

Among all the fractions, butanone fraction of LCME, (BNF-LCME) has shown better hepatoprotective activity and hence it is selected to evaluate the antihepatotoxicity against D-GaIN. The activity of BNF-LCME is well supported in in vitro and in vivo antioxidant studies and may be attributed to flavonoidal, phenolic compounds present in the fraction. Hence, BNF-LCME was subjected to the development of qualitative analytical profile using HPLC finger printing analysis.

Conclusions

All the fractions of LCME exhibited significant hepatoprotective activity and BNF-LCME (50 mg/kg) was identified as the most effective fraction.

Lindernia ciliata (Colsm.) Pennell of family Linderniaceae is a low growing, stoloniferous, mat-forming, annual, herb from 0.1–0.2 m high. It is restricted to the tropics and sub-tropics of Asia, northern Australia and North America. In India it is found as an insignificant weed, mainly in rice fields [1]. Traditionally it is used as a remedy for urinary disturbances, gonorrhea, headache, spleen diseases, asthma, jaundice, bronchitis, liver complaints, constipation, fever, loss of appetite, cough and skin diseases [2]. In view of its traditional medicinal use in the treatment of liver disorders, the present study was designed to separate the methanolic extract fractions of Lindernia ciliata and evaluate their hepatoprotective activity against three mechanistically devised models viz. paracetamol, ethanol and D-galactosamine induced hepatotoxicity in rats and its in vitro antioxidant activity. Furthermore, the qualitative analytical profile is developed for the bioactive fraction using HPLC fingerprinting analysis.

Animals

Wistar albino rats weighing 150–200 g were purchased from Sainath agencies, Hyderabad, Telangana, India with a prior permission from our institutional animal ethical committee (1820/GO/Re/S/15/CPCSEA, Date:01-09-2015) and used for the studies. The animals were caged under constant environmental and nutritional conditions (12:12 h light and dark cycle; at an ambient temperature of 25 ± 5 °C; 35–60% of relative humidity). They had free access to food and water ad libutum.

Collection and preparation of extracts

The whole plants of Lindernia ciliata were collected in August 2015, from cotton fields of Bhayyaram, Warangal, Telangana state, India. The plant was authenticated by Prof. V.S. Raju, taxonomist, Kakatiya University, Warangal. A voucher specimen of the plant (KU/UCPSC/54) is being maintained in the herbarium of Department of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal.

The whole plants were dried thoroughly under shade, powdered coarsely and macerated with methanol in a round bottomed flask for 7 days with stirring at regular intervals and filtered after 7 days. It is then concentrated under reduced pressure using Rotavapour evaporator, (Buchi Rotavapour, Switzerland) to yield a semisolid mass (7.2%) and coded as LCME. A Pilot study was conducted on LCME to fractionate it with toluene, ethyl acetate, butanone and n-butyl alcohol in succession. Based on the yield and TLC profile of the fractions, the solvents- toluene and butanone were selected for fractionation of LCME.

60 g of LCME was suspended in 500 mL of water and fractionated with toluene and butanone in succession. The obtained fractions were concentrated under reduced pressure to yield corresponding extracts. They were given the codes, as TLF-LCME (Toluene fraction), BNF-LCME (butanone fraction) and AQF-LCME (Aqueous fraction- the residue left in the water after fractionation process).

Total phenolic content

The total phenolic content of the fractions of LCME was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method [3]. The total phenolic content was expressed as Gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in mg per gram of extract.

Total flavonoid content

The total flavonoid content of the fractions of LCME was measured using the aluminium chloride colorimetric method [3]. It was expressed as Rutin equivalents (RE) in mg per gram of extract.

In vitro antioxidant studies

The fractions of LCME were screened to assess their antioxidant property by DPPH radical scavenging assay [4], superoxide scavenging activity [5], nitric oxide scavenging activity [6], hydroxyl radical scavenging activity [7], and reducing power assay [8].

Acute toxicity study

Acute toxicity study was carried out for all the fractions, TLF-LCME, BNF-LCME and AQF-LCME according to the OECD 423 guidelines [9] using female Wistar albino rats. They were observed for signs of toxicity and mortality for 72 h.

Assessment of hepatoprotective activity of fractions of LCME against paracetamol induced hepatotoxicity

The rats were divided into nine groups of six each, control, toxic, standard, and six test groups. The procedure was followed from Sabeena and Ajay, [10] with minor modifications.

Group I (Control group): Treated with vehicle, (1 ml/kg b.w. of 2% gum acacia in water) daily for 7 days.

Group II (Toxic group): Treated with vehicle (1 ml/kg b.w of 2% gum acacia in water) daily for 7 days followed by paracetamol on the eighth day.

Group III (Silymarin 100 mg/kg), Group IV (TLF-LCME 50 mg/kg), Group V (TLF-LCME 100 mg/kg), Group VI (BNF-LCME 50 mg/kg), Group VII (BNF-LCME 100 mg/kg), Group VIII (AQF-LCME 50 mg/kg) and Group IX (AQF-LCME 100 mg/kg) were treated with their respective standard or extracts followed by paracetamol on eighth day.

The blood and liver samples were collected from the animals of all groups 24 h after administration of paracetamol, for estimation of various serum biochemical parameters and histological studies respectively.

Assessment of antihepatotoxic activity of bioactive fraction against D-Galactosamine induced hepatotoxicity in rats

It was done according to Karan et al., [11] The rats were divided into five groups of six animals each. Group I served as normal and is given the vehicle i.e., 2% gum acacia in water (1 mL/kg b.w p.o) for 3 days. Toxic group (Group II), standard (Group III) and two test groups (Group IV, V) were given a single dose of D-Galactosamine (400 mg/kg intra peritoneal) on day 1 followed by vehicle (2% gum acacia 1 ml/kg b.w.p.o.), Silymarin (100 mg/kg b.w), BNF-LCME (50 mg/kg b.w) and BNF-LCME (100 mg/kg b.w) respectively for three times at the time point of 2 h, 24 h, 48 h after the administration of D-Galactosamine. The blood and liver samples were collected from the animals 1 h after the last treatment for determination of various serum biochemical parameters, in vivo antioxidant parameters and histological studies respectively.

Histological studies

The livers from all the animals were isolated and fixed in formalin solution and processed for histopathological examination.

Determination of prothrombin time (PT)

The prothrombin time was determined [12] by collecting blood from animals in normal capillary tubes and the capillaries were broken down into pieces until a thread was observed, and the clotting time was noted.

Development of qualitative analytical profile for the bioactive fraction

High performance liquid chromatography

The distinct chemo profile of the bioactive fraction was developed using HPLC. Shimadzu UFLC unit connected to Photo Diode Array detector was used. The column used was obtained from Grace smart (250 mm × 4.5 mm, Reverse phase C-8, 5 μm particle size). The details of the parameters maintained for the HPLC analysis are Mobile Phase: Methanol: Water: 10:90 (V/V); sample concentration: 100 μg/ml; volume of sample applied: 20 μl at detection wavelength: 220 nm.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test using GraphPad Prism version 3 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA).

Total phenolic and flavonoid contents

The phenolic and flavonoid contents of the fractions of LCME are shown in Table 1. Among all the fractions BNF-LCME has shown more phenolic and flavonoid contents i.e., 121.76 mg of GAE/g of extract and 34.48 mg of RE/g of extract respectively.

In vitro antioxidant studies

All the three fractions of LCME have shown a concentration dependent in vitro free radical scavenging activity. The IC₅₀ of fractions of LCME with their corresponding standards are shown in Table 2.

Reducing power assay

The results are expressed in terms of ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE). The reducing power of TLF-LCME, BNF-LCME and AQF-LCME were found to be 4.16 ± 0.25, 18.34 ± 0.27 and 6.59 ± 0.95 mg of AAE/g of extract respectively. Among all the fractions BNF-LCME has shown better activity which may be attributed due to the presence of more phenolic and flavonoid contents.

Acute toxicity study

The various fractions of LCME were found to be non toxic up to a dose of 1000 mg/kg in albino rats. Since LD50 of the fractions was greater than 1000 mg/kg b.w., the investigations on these fractions were carried out with two graded doses i.e. 50 and 100 mg/kg b.w.

Assessment of hepatoprotective activity of fractions of LCME against paracetamol induced hepatotoxicity

The rats treated with overdose of paracetamol (3 g/kg) caused significant liver damage which was evident from the changes in serum biochemical parameters and histology of liver of rats. The results are shown in Table 3 and histological results are shown in Fig. 1. The level of hepatospecific enzymes such as [Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP)], Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) were increased in serum indicating damage to the liver cell plasma membrane as these enzymes are normally present in cytoplasm. Pretreatment with all the three fractions of LCME at 50 and 100 mg/kg significantly reduced the elevated level of these enzymes in paracetamol treated rats. This reflects the ability of the fractions in preserving the structural integrity and protection of hepatocellular membrane which is attributed to their antioxidant activity. Paracetamol produces sufficient injury to hepatic parenchyma to cause large increase in bilirubin content [13]. Also a decrease in TP, albumin and prothrombin occurs due to the disruption and dissociation of polyribosome on endoplasmic reticulum leading to decrease in protein biosynthesis. Pretreatment with fractions of LCME at both test doses significantly (p < 0.01) decreased the bilirubin level, prothrombin time and increased the level of TP and ALB indicating the ability of the extracts in preventing the injury to hepatic parenchyma and facilitating the uninterrupted protein biosynthesis respectively. The histopathological examination of liver of rats treated with paracetamol showed centrilobular necrosis, inflammatory infiltration of lymphocytes, congestion of sinusoidal spaces, and bleeding in hepatic lobes. Pretreatment with fractions and Standard (Silymarin 100 mg/kg) exhibited a significant (P < 0.001) protection against paracetamol induced hepatic damage by reversal of the altered level of serum biochemical parameters and by minimising the histopathological abnormalities. Among all the fractions, percentage protection shown by BNF-LCME at 50 and 100 mg/kg b.w.p.o. was comparable to that of standard drug, Silymarin 100 mg/kg b.w.

Effect of fractions of LCME on histopathological changes in liver of rats in paracetamol induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Done by using Digital Motic Microscope, Magification 100X. a = Normal, b = Toxic, c = Standard, d = TLF-LCME 50, e = TLF-LCME 100, f=BNF-LCME 50, g = BNF-LCME 100, h = AQF-LCME 50, i = AQF-LCME 100, TLF-LCME: Toulene fraction of methanolic extract fraction of Lindernia ciliata; BNF-LCME: Butanol fraction of methanolic extract fraction of Lindernia ciliata; AQF-LCME: Aqueous fraction of methanolic extract fraction of Lindernia ciliata

Full size image

Assessment of antihepatotoxic activity of BNF-LCME against D-Galactosamine induced hepatotoxicity in rats

Among all the fractions, BNF-LCME at both test doses has shown remarkable protection against paracetamol induced hepatic damage in rats. Hence the same is selected to assess the curative effect against D-Galactosamine induced hepatotoxicity in rats. The results of the study indicating serum biochemical parameters and prothrombin time are shown in Table 4 whereas the results of in vivo antioxidant activity are presented in Table 5 and histological results are shown in Fig. 2. The hepatotoxicity induced by D-Galactosamine (D-Galactosamine) resembles that of human viral hepatitis both in metabolic and morphological aberrations that always caused peri-portal inflammation [14] and hepatocyte apoptosis [15]. Treatment with BNF-LCME at 50 and 100 mg/kg decreased the level of serum ALT, AST, ALP and LDH, suggesting extract’s ability to scavenge reactive oxygen species generated from D-Galactosamine intoxication and hence prevent hepatic cellular enzymes from leaking into the blood. Increase in serum bilirubin level in D-Galactosamine treated rats is due to abnormal excretion of bile by the liver. Administration of BNF-LCME at 50 and 100 mg/kg decreased the serum bilirubin level indicating the extract’s ability to repair the damaged hepatocytes. In addition it also increased the reduced levels of TP and ALB in serum which may be attributed to the extract’s ability to stabilize endoplasmic reticulum and trigger protein synthesis. The extract also increased the serum GLU level by eliminating the toxic metabolite and accelerating the formation of hepatic UTP. Liver synthesizes different clotting factors such as I, II, V, VII, IX and X [16]. Apart from the effect on other hepatospecific parameters, the fraction, BNF-LCME also showed a significant (p < 0.001) recovery in PT which indicates the improved synthetic capacity of the liver.

Antihepatotoxic activity of BNF-LCME against D-Galactosamine induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Done by using Digital Motic Microscope, Magification 100X. a: normal, b: Toxic, c: Standard, d:BNF-LCME-50, e:BNF-LCME-100, BNF-LCME: Butanone fraction of methanolic extract fraction of Lindernia ciliata

Full size image

The histological examination of the liver of rats treated with D-Galactosamine showed inflammation of portal tract, hyperplasia of kupffer cells, vacuolization of hepatocytes and bleeding in midzonal areas. Treatment with BNF-LCME at 50 and 100 mg/kg has shown significant recovery against the damage, which may be due to prevention of accumulation of UDP-Galactosamine in liver cells there by inhibiting various signaling pathways leading to apoptotic cell death.

The increase in MDA or decrease in GSH and CAT levels in liver homogenate of D-Galactosamine treated rats indicates the lipid peroxidation. MDA is one of the end products resulting from the peroxidation of biological membrane composing of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) [17]. Glutathione (GSH) is a non enzymatic antioxidant which prevents damage to important cellular components caused by reactive oxygen species such as free radicals and peroxides [18]. CAT is known to breakdown H₂O₂ to H₂O and O₂ and can be found in the peroxisome and mitochondria, especially in liver. The groups receivedBNF-LCME and Standard prior to D-Galactosamine administration exhibited significant protection against lipid peroxidation as evident from decrease in MDA level increase in GSH and CAT levels indicating the in vivo antioxidant potential of BNF-LCME. The significant antioxidant effect of BNF-LCME revealed that it has the ability to ameliorate oxidative stress and preserve hepatic function against free radicals produced by D-Galactosamine intoxification.

High performance liquid chromatography of BNF-LCME

Plant extracts are complex mixtures of varied chemicals, which pose a problem in standardization and quality control, but these chemicals are responsible for imparting therapeutic effect with the advantage of synergistic and additive effects and at the same time having fewer side effects [19]. Consequently, the herbal drug preparation itself as a whole is regarded as the active substance. Hence, the reproducibility of the total configuration of herbal drug constituents is important. To meet this requirement it is essential to establish the chemo profiles of the samples by TLC/HPLC/GLC/ HPTLC. Hence, TLC and HPLC profile of the selected bio active fraction, BNF-LCME was developed to ensure its quality.

The results of the HPLC study are shown in Fig. 3 and Table 6. The HPLC chromatogram of BNF-LCME showed three peaks corresponding to at least 3 compounds. Among the three peaks, two peaks were found to be major with percentage peak area 34.82% and 39.35% at retention times 1.848 and 2.54 min respectively.

HPLC chromatogram of BNF-LCME

BNF-LCME: Butanone fraction of methanolic extract of Lindernia ciliata

Full size image

All the fractions of LCME exhibited significant hepatoprotective activity and BNF-LCME (50 mg/kg) was identified as the most effective fraction which may be attributed to the flavonoidal/phenolic compounds present in the fraction.

All the data was analysed by using the software, Graph pad prism 3.0 version which is available online.

AAE:

Ascorbic acid equivalent

ALB:

Albumin

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

ALT:

Alanine transaminase

AQF-LCME:

Aqueous fraction of LCME

AST:

Aspartate transaminase

BNF-LCME:

Butanone fraction of LCME

CAT:

Catalase

DB:

Direct bilirubin

DPPH:

1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical

GAE:

Gallic acid equivalents

GGT:

Gamma glutamyl transferase

GSH:

Glutathione

LCME:

Methanolic extract of Lindernia ciliata

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

MDA:

Melondialdehyde

RE:

Rutin equivalents

TB:

Total bilirubin

TLF-LCME:

Toluene fraction of LCME

TP:

Total protein

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by a grant (UGC sanction No.F.7–106/2007 (BSR), dated January 16, 2012) from UGC-BSR Meritorious Research Fellowship, New Delhi.

Affiliations

1. University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telangana state, 506009, India
   • Praneetha Pallerla
   • , Narsimha Reddy Yellu
   •  & Ravi Kumar Bobbala

Contributions

PP performed all the animal studies, analyzed and interpreted the data and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. NRY performed the histological examination of the liver, and in vivo antioxidant studies. RKB performed the phytochemical studies, selection, collection and preparation of plant extract fractions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

BRK is Dr. B. Ravi Kumar, Professor, in University college of Pharmaceutical sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telangana, India with 30 years of research experience.

YNR is Dr. Yellu Narsimha Reddy, Professor, in University college of Pharmaceutical sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telangana, India with 25 years of research experience.

PP is Dr. P. Praneetha, pursued PhD under the joint supervision of Prof. BRK and Prof.YNR, in University college of Pharmaceutical sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telangana, India.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Praneetha Pallerla.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal studies were performed with a prior permission from our institutional animal ethical committee with registered number.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reprints and Permissions